Search for: "MATTER OF RULES OF EVIDENCE"
Results 4241 - 4260
of 42,199
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2013, 8:39 pm
Michael's in Ridgecrest) that as a matter of law, their attempt to disaffiliate from ECUSA was invalid, while a Tulare County judge ruled -- on the same set of facts -- that there were disputed issues about the withdrawal of St. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 7:00 am
The hearing in the superior court is actually a trial and the rules of evidence apply. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 1:28 pm
The courts in patent cases do this through nuanced rulings, with the assistance of double-speak case law. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
See Rule 14a-21, 17 CFR 240.14a-21. [read post]
1 May 2012, 7:34 am
It's not clear what other evidence existed to convict the woman, but she pleaded guilty anyway. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 6:36 am
On December 12, 2006, the Third Circuit ruled in United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 3:12 pm
Court Agrees to Hear Matter Pertaining to Exclusion of Black Jurors in Georgia Murder Trial – Foster v. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 7:23 pm
Like the government’s brief, Peter offers precisely zero evidence that the Founders thought as much. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 3:00 am
Citing Matter of Verma v Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y., 192 AD3d 616, the Appellate Division observed that "a probationary employee may be terminated without a hearing for any reason or no reason at all, as long as the dismissal was not unlawful or in bad faith. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 4:00 am
The claim was controverted by the employer, who was “self-insured,” and in 1995 the employee's claim was marked closed due to a lack of prima facie medical evidence. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 5:59 am
Cir. 1923) for the evaluation of novel scientific evidence being offered by an expert. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
.), the court ruled that venue was proper over all of the Defendants in this matter because one of the Defendants had sufficient quantity and quality of contacts so as to qualify Philadelphia County as a proper venue. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 6:18 am
Importantly, the Supreme Court did not decide as a matter of law that class-wide proof could never be established. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 8:52 am
It found no evidence that CSX had been aware of the incident in 2001, but that in any event "even had the Carrier been aware of the events of 2001, it would have had no cause to bring charges against Claimant in relation to those events unless and until he sought to be returned to service -- something he might not have done after being furloughed, so that the matter would never have arisen. [read post]
7 May 2019, 5:00 am
Williamson ruled that a claim against a truck driver's employer for negligent hiring, retention, supervision or entrustment cannot stand in the absence of a related claim for punitive damages.In the case of Sullivan v. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 3:00 am
Citing Matter of Verma v Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y., 192 AD3d 616, the Appellate Division observed that "a probationary employee may be terminated without a hearing for any reason or no reason at all, as long as the dismissal was not unlawful or in bad faith. [read post]
14 May 2020, 11:00 pm
The court ruled that, since the tortfeasor had admitted liability, these two (2) car accident lawsuits “no longer present any common question or law or fact and instead involve individual injuries, different items of damages, and distinct supporting evidence. [read post]
16 May 2016, 6:00 am
Courts in a few states -- Arizona, Connecticut, Illinois, Kansas -- have ruled that teachers are public figures (public officials); and a few states have ruled that they are not -- California, Florida, Texas, Maine, and Virginia. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 8:52 am
It found no evidence that CSX had been aware of the incident in 2001, but that in any event "even had the Carrier been aware of the events of 2001, it would have had no cause to bring charges against Claimant in relation to those events unless and until he sought to be returned to service -- something he might not have done after being furloughed, so that the matter would never have arisen. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 11:49 am
”2 Obviously, this simple, logical rule should have been incorporated in a BIA precedent decision by now. [read post]
