Search for: "People v Justice A."
Results 4241 - 4260
of 23,044
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2012, 4:54 pm
Back in 2003, Justice Scalia, dissenting from Kennedy’s opinion in Lawrence v. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 4:30 am
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 4:50 am
Vacha v. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
Courthouses should be named for people in the justice business, not the war racket, and although I think that the narrative of American jurisprudence over-exalts judges somewhat both Jackson and Curtin deserve the honor. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 6:45 am
In Chiafalo v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 12:51 am
Last January the California Supreme Court found in People v. [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 7:26 am
Two weeks earlier, I speculated that Justice Alito lost the majority opinion in Gonzales v. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 1:59 am
Following the oral argument in Heller, people have been having a good old time making fun of the Justices and their pretty transparent political motivations. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 5:16 am
In Vasquez v. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 11:54 am
As Justice Barrett explained in Biden v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 6:17 am
" Here is how it starts:Last week, in Danforth v. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 9:05 pm
Justices Seem OK With DNA-Based Warrant by Mike McKee of The Recorder on Law.com: At issue in People v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 6:34 am
” In NASA v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 6:34 am
” In NASA v. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 8:38 am
Now that the ACLU has helped win the freedom to marry nationwide through Obergefell v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 11:52 am
From Justice Jackson's opinion, joined by Justice Sotomayor, dissenting from the denial of certiorari today in Harness v. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 11:13 am
It is fair to say that due to the appointment of Justice Brett Kavanaugh, a great many people — certainly including scholars as well as activists — expected this term to see the Supreme Court begin to move against Roe v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 2:49 pm
In People v. [read post]
26 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
Abbott, and Harris v. [read post]
