Search for: "People v. David" Results 4241 - 4260 of 6,015
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2011, 9:40 pm
" ruling in Thuiskopie v Opus for jiplp. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 10:36 am by Jasmine Joseph
While the Mississippi Supreme Court might disagree with DeShaney v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 3:20 am by SHG
” I’m not an expert on this area of law, but I do know that a district court recently upheld a similar law, in Genesee Scrap & Tin Baling Co. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 12:53 am by Melina Padron
The Act prescribes the right of people in Scotland to claim damages for an asbestos-related condition. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 12:02 pm by Terry Hart
David Post responds, in his article Why Should We Care What Jefferson Thought about Copyright, to my earlier post on the subject regarding Jefferson’s letter to Isaac McPherson. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 6:41 am by Charon QC
@legalbizzle on his blog writes:The Angry Pencil: a pathology of customer complaints “There are people who can’t let a bandwagon go unjumped on. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:50 am by Eoin Daly
Thish was evident in the Byrne v Minister for Finance case, where the Supreme Court eschewed any excessively literalist approach to the existing article 35.5, privileging the purpose and value of the literal rule. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:32 am by Eoin Daly
 Although it was held in Byrne v Minister for Finance that article 35.5 does not prevent the imposition of a generally applicable income tax on judicial salaries, the previous Government concluded, in 2009, that it precluded the imposition on judges not only of the public sector pay cuts, but also, the pension levy. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 7:25 am by Ronald Collins
Supreme Court (5th ed., 2010) edited by David Savage of the Los Angeles Times. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
But using history appropriately is about more than finding nice sounding quotes from important people. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 2:59 am
"They've gone to assessing what a piece of paper, what the computer tells them, and ignoring the reality of people getting sick and dying from a preventable disease," said David Plunkett, senior staff attorney for the Center for Science in the Public Interest. [read post]