Search for: "Shields, in Re"
Results 4241 - 4260
of 4,361
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
By Adam Thierer & Berin Szoka As we mentioned yesterday, in a new series of essays, we will be examining proposals being put forward today that would have the government play a greater role in sustaining struggling media enterprises, “saving journalism,” or promoting more “public interest” content. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 6:48 am
Dalkon Shield Claimants Trust, 156 F.3d 248, 253 (1st Cir.1998). [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 7:26 am
Over objection, President Clinton’s secret service guards were ordered to testify before the grand jury during the Lewinsky scandal (In re Sealed Case, 1998), but presidents have nonetheless continued to rely on the discretion of the Secret Service. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 3:00 am
Trump Mar-a-Lago Special Master Struck Down by Appeals Court MSN – Perry Stein and Devlin Barrett (Washington Post) | Published: 12/1/2022 A federal appeals court panel halted an outside review of thousands of documents seized from former President Trump’s Florida residence, ruling a lower-court judge was wrong to appoint an expert to decide whether any of the material should be shielded from criminal investigators. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 5:29 am
http://bit.ly/MoacPj (Michael Arkfeld, Stephanie Loquvam) Be Considerate When You Share Data - http://bit.ly/QzeYZ7 (Amy Bowser-Rollins) Challenges of Conducting eDiscovery on Ephemeral Data - http://bit.ly/OCkHL1 (Brian Esser, Judy Selby) Concept over Keywords – Why Search Still Matters for Law Firms - http://bit.ly/Mh4Hkm (Simon Price) CVEDR Take II – Monkeys and Magistrates in Monterey - http://bit.ly/M3NM4u (Greg Buckles)… [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 6:41 am
Dep’t of Justice, Re: Amenability of the President, Vice President and Other Civil Officers to Federal Criminal Prosecution While in Office, at 36 (Sept. 24, 1973) (“With respect to his responsibility as tie breaker his immunity from prosecution should be analogized to that of Members of Congress under Article I, section 6, clause 1 of the Constitution. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 5:33 pm
This week the Leveson Inquiry resumed after a two week break, with a long-awaited appearance by News Corporation chairman Rupert Murdoch and his son James. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 7:26 am
By Steven G. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 8:30 pm
National/Federal Attorney General William Barr to Step Down Politico – Josh Gerstein and Kyle Cheney | Published: 12/14/2020 Attorney General William Barr is leaving his position, a decision that follows months of complaints from President Trump about the administration’s top lawyer. [read post]
28 May 2022, 2:25 pm
The Supreme Court has re-affirmed this common law framework in the Warren case and its progeny like Castle Rock, etc. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am
Among the important questions that will need to be answered in connection with the current wave of failed bank litigation is the question of extent to which the non-director officers will be able to defend themselves in reliance on the business judgment rule. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
In many jurisdictions, corporate officials sued for their actions undertaken in their corporate capacity may be able to defend themselves in reliance on the “business judgment rule. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:59 am
They're also not interested in growth at all costs. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm
There is reason to believe the SEC’s new universal proxy Rule 14a-19 will result in more stockholder nominees being elected to the boards of public companies. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 1:26 pm
(Editor’s Note: This post is based on a client memorandum by Jonathan C. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am
As I noted at the time, on March 20, 2018, the U.S. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 10:34 am
Key Findings Policymakers on both the left and right have brought industrial policy back into focus after slow growth over the past few decades and growing concern over the state of America’s manufacturing sector. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 7:36 am
Garland additionally said he would “expect to re-up” those guidelines, though he shares our understanding that they weren’t rescinded or amended by the Trump Justice Department. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am
II. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 2:55 pm
See In re D.W.G., 391 S.W.3d 154, 164 (Te [read post]
