Search for: "United States v. Herring"
Results 4241 - 4260
of 23,686
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
27 May 2024, 2:50 am
Trans Union, LLC – A Win for Consumer Protection In a notable decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, the case of Sessa v. [read post]
26 Oct 2006, 6:25 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 12:27 pm
See United States v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 10:15 am
DeStefano which is now before the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 2:27 pm
In United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 3:31 pm
Today, the United States Supreme Court upheld the Federal law banning partial-birth (i.e., late term) abortions. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 7:27 am
Competing union interestsBuffalo CSD v Local 264, 270 AD2d 814Suppose an arbitration award in favor of an employee in one collective bargaining unit adversely affects an employee of the same employer in another collective bargaining unit. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 3:30 am
Second Circuit precedent controls The Christiansen case was decided in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (i.e., New York City). [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 7:09 am
The Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution guarantees the right to a fair and impartial trial. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 8:46 am
Department of Justice in United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 1:27 pm
But in United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 12:39 pm
As I discussed in a recent post, the United States Supreme Court left many questions unanswered in its two recent decisions on life without parole for juveniles. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 12:25 pm
On Monday, October 6, the United States Supreme Court denied certiorari review in Rainey v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 12:27 pm
The Court determined the law did not violate Equal Protection Clauses of the United States and New York Constitutions, as the partner failed to show that law did not have legitimate governmental purpose. [read post]
1 Dec 2006, 6:35 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 4:47 am
The result here is consistent with the Sixth Circuit's rulings in cases like United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2007, 8:37 pm
LEXIS 2079 (July 11, 2007): [*P19] Here, Snead's Section 1983 claims are grounded in the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. [read post]
16 Nov 2008, 11:04 am
The 4th Amendment to the United State's Constitution says "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated... [read post]
