Search for: "English v. English"
Results 4261 - 4280
of 9,846
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2008, 8:15 pm
It is simply stated for the purpose of a disclosure to the parties of the chance contact.Such are the vagaries of life.Link: Miles v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
Letters Blogatory honors our veterans on Veteran's DayIn the case of the day, Avelar v. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 11:06 am
“So you think we don’t speak English, or don’t understand English? [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 6:51 am
” Miranda v. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 6:51 am
Comment The court has held that malicious prosecution of civil proceedings between private individuals is actionable in English law. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 7:46 am
Tugendhat said in the Terry case: “Open justice is one of the oldest principles of English law, going back to before Magna Carta. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 8:56 am
The case is Madison v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 2:10 am
Lord Justice Jacob found that the English courts would tend to follow any principle of law laid down by the TBA, but need not accord such considerable respect to its findings on matters of fact and degree. [read post]
18 Aug 2021, 2:46 am
Lord Hodge explains that there are two circumstances in which the English courts have recognised lawful act duress. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 2:09 am
The first question – about the English copyright – was the more important for Mr Ainsworth. [read post]
15 May 2018, 3:53 am
The Supreme Court, in the 5-3 decision in McCoy v. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 5:01 pm
" Applicant, based on its reading of Palm Bay Import, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:07 am
See Rosalind English’s commentary to this case here. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 1:31 pm
In Bunt v. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 7:42 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 2:31 am
English Law Contractual Position The general position under English contract law is that where there is an enforceable obligation to perform, such obligation is absolute. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 1:18 am
1538: Aidan O’Neill QC submits that the role of this court is to rebalance the constitution. 1530: Aidan O’Neill QC refers to the decision in Padfield v Minister of Agriculture at page 1061 of the decision. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 8:09 am
John Doe v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 8:13 am
Potts v. [read post]
