Search for: "English v. English"
Results 4261 - 4280
of 11,196
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2017, 9:46 pm
It can be used in lieu of the traditional materials in legal English or similar approaches. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 12:39 am
The dispute over the unauthorized publication of the private etchings of Prince Albert and the recognition of a right in confidences was still over 50 years away (Prince Albert v. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 4:00 am
Rollins v Niagara Regional Police Service et al., 2016 ONSC 7735 [53] Mr. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 3:30 am
In plain English, what does this mean for your business? [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 3:30 am
In plain English, what does this mean for your business? [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 7:38 am
V. [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 6:32 pm
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. , January 4, 2017, Kendall, V.). [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 4:37 pm
Supreme Court issued its opinion in Morrison v National Australia Bank, the lower courts have worked out a host of issues about how Morrison applies in a variety of circumstances. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 4:11 am
., Ltd and Others v AbbVie Biotechnology Limited [2016] EWHC 3383 (Ch). [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 6:25 pm
Baltimore, and Dred Scott v. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 11:00 am
Bus. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 4:45 am
And another one for those who prefer English. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 4:12 pm
The last year was a relatively quiet one in the English media law courts, with only two defamation trials involving the media (and none involving the national press). [read post]
1 Jan 2017, 8:58 pm
Or does the French text necessarily mean what the English means? [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 2:58 pm
Permission to appeal in patent cases - farewell to the Pozzoli approachGuest Kat Eibhlin Vardy recaps the case Teva UK Ltd v Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co KG, [2016] EWCA Civ 1296. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 3:23 am
A good arbitration case serving as guidance is B&R Typical Case 6 (Zhe Jiang Yisheng Petrochemical Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 pm
While the Privacy and Electronic Communications Directive regulated the behaviour of communications providers generally, Article 1(3) of that Directive specifies that matters covered by Titles V and VI of the TEU at that time (e.g. public security, defence, State security) fall outside the scope of the directive, which the Court described as relating to “activities of the State” . [read post]
24 Dec 2016, 6:47 am
In Olson v Olson, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2013 WL 12147783 (M.D. [read post]
24 Dec 2016, 6:05 am
And by "always" I mean both meanings predate modern English. [read post]
