Search for: "High v State"
Results 4261 - 4280
of 35,497
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2024, 9:25 am
., v. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 11:23 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Mitchell v Revenue & Customs Prosecutions Office & Anor [2008] EWCA Crim 1741 (30 July 2008) S & Ors, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 1636 (4 July 2008) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Lifely v Lifely [2008] EWCA Civ 904 (30 July 2008) KH (Sudan) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 887 (30 July 2008) Donaldson v O’Sullivan [2008] EWCA Civ 879 (30… [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 5:00 am
In Dobbs v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 11:35 am
In the case recently decided by the state's high court, the two juveniles were 17 in 2008 when they were on a hill behind a residential street in Pasadena. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 2:02 am
On this date, the Supreme Court decided West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 9:07 pm
State Farm Mut. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 4:48 am
State v. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 9:02 am
Introduction States are set to receive $195.3 billion in fiscal relief under the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA), equivalent to 20 percent of the annual tax collections of state governments.[1] With state revenues essentially flat in 2020 (a net decline of less than 0.2 percent), the greatest challenge for states may be figuring out what to do with it. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:46 pm
The doctrine has been approved by the High Court of Australia: Potter v Broken Hill Proprietary Co Ltd (1906) 3 CLR 479; [1906] HCA 88; Attorney-General (United Kingdom) v Heinemann Publishers Australia Pty Ltd (1988) 165 CLR 30; [1988] HCA 25. [read post]
24 May 2018, 10:50 pm
However, the judge stated that the “uncertain state of the law” meant that his conclusion on this point could only be provisional ([132]) until the CJEU gives guidance in Sky v SkyKick on what circumstances may constitute bad faith. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 8:01 am
See United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 4:22 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 4:51 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 7:51 am
State v. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 4:27 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2016, 7:00 am
Keegan.This case was prosecuted by Assistant Attorney General Philip V. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 12:00 pm
YSL's attorneys therefore maintained that Louboutin is not entitled to a trademark for the red soles, citing the United States Supreme Court's 1995 decision in Qualitex v. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 1:24 pm
In Penn State University v. [read post]
27 Dec 2015, 2:32 am
While the Court did not state the percentage, it is believed to be as high as 30%. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 4:51 am
State v. [read post]
