Search for: "House v. House" Results 4261 - 4280 of 41,220
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2014, 2:31 am by Jeremy
This article takes a look at one of the seminal pieces of English litigation on common law copyright: Donaldson v Becket(t). [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 4:56 am by Ben Rubin
  Either the California Supreme Court will hold, as many practitioners believe is appropriate, that Koontz v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 12:23 pm by Giles Peaker
Baptie v The Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames (2022) EWCA Civ 888 This was a second appeal, brought by RBKT from a s.204 appeal that had overturned their decision that Ms Baptie was intentionally homeless from a housing association property due to rent arrears. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:54 pm by Giles Peaker
He claimed housing benefit for ‘rent’ for what appears to have been a lodger arrangement. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 12:00 pm by Giles Peaker
James v Hertsmere Borough Council (2020) EWCA Civ 489 What can be addressed in a section 204 Housing Act 1996 appeal of a review decision? [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 3:48 pm
The Washington Times reported in Abstinence plan expires, for now (6/30):A federal abstinence education program and welfare-to-work medical assistance program are set to expire today as the House failed this week to renew them. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 11:00 am by Paul Caron
Yang (Montclair State University, Department of Accounting, Law and Taxation), Foreign Tax Credit versus Foreign Earned Income Exclusion Under the New Law: This paper deals with the recent new law concerning foreign earned income exclusion and foreign housing cost allowance exclusion. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 6:19 am
" from the Wall Street Journal and Pete Wehner's "The Increasingly Self-Pitying Obama White House" from... [read post]
15 May 2008, 12:41 pm
Dennis Quaid testified yesterday before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform considering the reversal of the Riegel v. [read post]
15 May 2008, 12:41 pm
Dennis Quaid testified yesterday before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform considering the reversal of the Riegel v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 6:58 am
In engaging on the issue of same-sex marriage, the justices have "thus demonstrate(d) an inability to be objective," and should therefore withdraw from the Obergefell v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 6:43 pm
Related Issues: Free SpeechAnonymityCyberSLAPPRelated Cases: Carreon v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 8:20 am
I'm no criminal mastermind, but when your house mysteriously burns down and you feel like engaging in insurance fraud by faking the value of the property inside the home, I'm pretty sure that you shouldn't tell the insurance company that one of the things burned in the fire was a painting (1) that you never owned, (2) that's been hanging in the New York Museum of Modern Art for 50+ years, and (3) that's amongst the most recognizable paintings in the entire world.Not… [read post]