Search for: "J. H.1" Results 4261 - 4280 of 4,859
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2023, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan and Michael C. Dorf
Within a matter of only a few weeks (as early as June 1), President Joe Biden could be left with no course of action that is legal—including “doing nothing,” which is in fact its own kind of illegal action, as we will explain shortly.In the face of such high stakes, with nothing short of economic Armageddon being very much a possibility, it is understandable that people would want to find a workaround that would allow this Democratic President finally to stop the… [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 10:36 am by Schachtman
Specious, Speculative, Spurious, and Sophistical Some legal writers assert that all evidence is ultimately “probable,” but that assertion appears to be true only to the extent that the evidentiary support for any claim can be mapped on scale from 0 to 1, much as probability is. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 10:28 am
You might think that granting any exemptions would involve too much time, effort, and therefore money. h. [read post]
3 Jan 2009, 9:48 am
E-Proxy Update In 2007, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) adopted rules providing for proxy materials (including the proxy statement, a proxy card, the “glossy” annual report and any other soliciting materials) to be made available to shareholders via a publicly accessible Internet website other than the SEC’s EDGAR website (the “E-Proxy Rules“).[1] Starting January 1, 2009, all public companies… [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 12:59 pm by admin
”[1] Cranor’s intent was to deride my comments, but they hold up fairly well. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 3:02 pm
Segundo o relator, “dúvidas não há sobre o preceito constitucional atinente à natureza do CNJ. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
There are no new PCC adjudications this week, but four new resolved PCC cases: Mr Johnny Dean v NME NME, Clause 3, 25/01/2013; Mr Ian Calland v Golf Monthly, Clause 1, 24/01/2013; Mr Martin Jones v Reading Post, Clause 1, 24/01/2013 and Dame Tessa Jowell v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 24/01/2013. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 5:31 pm by Dan Harris
 What pleases me is how the list of worthwhile books continues to grow and to diversify in terms of subject matter. if you want help understanding China’s legal system or aspects of it, I recommend the following Chinese Business Law books for the folllowing reasons: 1. [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 8:30 pm by Douglas
Há ainda a coleção do próprio GDR, exclusiva para consulta dos ministros da Corte. [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 8:30 pm by Douglas
Há ainda a coleção do próprio GDR, exclusiva para consulta dos ministros da Corte. [read post]