Search for: "MATTER OF J M J" Results 4261 - 4280 of 5,084
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2010, 7:36 am by Cathy Moran, Esq.
Going forward, I’m committed to polishing my lists and seeing that  we use them routinely. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 10:30 am by Ilya Somin
These matters are of great importance to experts, but less likely to be essential reading for high school students. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 12:09 am by Orin Kerr
Hrasky, 567 F.3d 367 (8th Cir. 2009) (Colloton, J.) [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:23 pm by Venkat
  I'm sure I've thrown in the barbed footnote once or twice. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am by Hilde
Many great judicial legacies have a deep theoretical foundation—Oliver Wendell Holmes’s skeptical pragmatism, William J. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 3:14 pm by Jeff Gamso
  It is about insisting that principles matter and the first principle isn't j'accuse. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 10:18 am by Kevin
Benefits Biz Blog  Authored by Baker & Daniels' benefits & executive compensation team, the Benefits Biz Blog covers financial matters. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 10:18 am by Kevin
Benefits Biz Blog  Authored by Baker & Daniels' benefits & executive compensation team, the Benefits Biz Blog covers financial matters. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 10:53 am by Kevin
., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hart, J.), entered July 10, 2008, as, upon the granting of that branch of the motion of the defendants Stanley Sprecher, Peninsula Radiology Associates, P.C., and Peninsula Hospital Center pursuant to CPLR 4401, made at the close of the plaintiffs' case, which was for judgment as a matter of law dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them, upon a… [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 3:00 am by Eric Turkewitz
Chris Overby and Levine Overby Hollis, M.D.s, P.C., pursuant to CPLR 4401, made at the close of the plaintiffs' case, for judgment as a matter of law dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them is denied, the order entered December 3, 2007, is modified accordingly, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for a new trial as to the defendants M. [read post]