Search for: "State v. Doctor" Results 4261 - 4280 of 9,632
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2020, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
First up is Nasrallah v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 11:26 am
 Heather, thank you for communicating and meeting [me and our daughter] at her doctor's appointment last Thursday morning. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 11:17 pm
Holocaust Memorial Museum archives)Justice TrialThere was also the 3d proceeding, United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 9:15 am by admin
Tenpenny, D.O., Case No. 22-CRF-0168 State Medical Board of Ohio (Aug. 9, 2023). [8] David Gorski, “The American Board of Internal Medicine finally acts against two misinformation-spreading doctors,” Science-Based Medicine (Aug. 7, 2023). [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 7:51 pm by Moshe (Thomas A.) Sharon, R.N., M.P.H.
The Internal Struggle for Dominance Determines Our State of Health In relating these Hassidic concepts to healing and wellness in a modern world, we need to understand that the struggle for dominance between the intellect and emotion determines our state of health and influences the course and outcome of any disease. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 7:17 am by Peter Thompson & Associates
Plaintiff allegedly told the doctor that the tests were negative, and the doctor stated the only mistake he made was to trust what the patient had said. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 6:12 am by Joy Waltemath
Although HHC wrote to his doctor stating that 75 percent of his duties involved on-site construction supervision, there was evidence that during the decades he worked from the central office, he did office work 80 percent of the time and only spent 20 percent onsite. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
To state a prima facie case of employment discrimination due to a disability, a plaintiff must demonstrate that he or she suffered from a disability and that the disability caused the behavior for which he or she was terminated (Matter of McEniry v Landi, 84 NY2d 554). [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am by Schachtman
  The court thus concluded that the doctor had in fact: “practiced medicine in Utah, without a licence [sic], and [that] these practices resulted in the diagnostic reports that now serve as the basis for Plaintiffs’ law suits. [read post]