Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 4261 - 4280
of 9,114
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2017, 9:21 am
See Nken v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 6:32 am
The agency again asserted the state secrets privilege, and the district court granted summary judgment. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 6:20 am
First, the rule fosters judicial restraint: courts faced with unsettled questions avoid pronouncements that are perhaps unnecessary and undesirable because the rightholders do not wish to assert their rights. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 9:41 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued its per curiam ruling in Washington v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 7:16 pm
Fox v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 6:04 pm
First, the court firmly rejects the assertion of the Trump Administration that “the district court lacked authority to enjoin enforcement of the Executive Order because the President has ‘unreviewable authority to suspend the admission of any class of aliens. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 5:52 pm
The court cites Boumediene v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 8:59 am
The Western District of Washington had the first crack at review. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 3:34 am
[defendant] shall be deemed to reside … in any judicial district in which such defendant is subject to the court’s personal jurisdiction. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 1:25 pm
” “‘By giving them the label of being criminals then often the child fits the label and pursues that path, and the rest is destructive in that way,’ said Ninth Judicial District Public Defender Robert Wesley. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 1:25 pm
” “‘By giving them the label of being criminals then often the child fits the label and pursues that path, and the rest is destructive in that way,’ said Ninth Judicial District Public Defender Robert Wesley. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 12:38 pm
Two decades after writing the landmark United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 10:34 am
I hope the decision-makers at those companies will focus not only on their employees from and customers in certain countries but also appreciate the President's efforts to protect them.Thankfully, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has published several documents relating to State of Washington & State of Minnesota v. [read post]
4 Feb 2017, 5:46 am
The primary [Supreme Court] case on which the panel relies, Plyler v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm
App’x 944 (10th Cir. 2012) (joined opinion) “grant of COA did not preclude affirmance of district court order enforcing procedural defaults” United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 10:52 am
Buchanan’s bankrupt project for placing State corporations at the mercy of the Federal Courts. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 10:48 am
That will offend judicial sensibilities—already evidenced by the district court orders over the weekend—which start with procedural regularity. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 10:32 am
The opinion rejects an argument by the Oklahoma attorney general that the fact that the federal district court clerk had sent the remand order to the state court purportedly deprived the court of appeals of the opportunity to consider whether to grant review under CAFA. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 9:00 pm
The second step is a trial on those charges, conducted not by a court, but by the Senate (albeit with the Chief Justice of the United States presiding). [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 11:51 am
De Niz Robles v. [read post]
