Search for: "United States v. Minor" Results 4261 - 4280 of 7,098
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am by chief
The minority in Kay would, in a nutshell, have made gateway (b) somewhat wider (Lord Bingham's not quite so famous [39]). [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am by chief
The minority in Kay would, in a nutshell, have made gateway (b) somewhat wider (Lord Bingham's not quite so famous [39]). [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 3:00 pm by Tung Yin
United States, 503 U.S. 540, 549 (1992), holds that entrapment must be decided by the factfinder under the usual "proof beyond a reasonable doubt" standard, and therefore, arguably not in a pre-trial motion. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 2:13 pm by Lyle Denniston
”  For that part of its ruling, the state court majority relied in part upon a comment the Supreme Court had made in its controversial campaign finance decision last year in Citizens United v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 12:16 am by William Carleton
The first three paragraphs explain the scope of the decision in Perry v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 9:12 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Fisher then petitioned to the United States Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari, and the petition remains on the Court’s current docket. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 8:15 pm
The United States appeals Joseph Hairston's 60- month sentence, which was re-imposed by the district court on remand in light of United States v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 2:21 am by Aida Tohala (Bristows)
On 4 May 2023, a mere two weeks after the conclusion of the hearing, the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in Sandoz and Teva v BMS. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 4:45 pm
  If not, and in the case of the asserted claims of race discrimination the minority thought not, the minority suggested that a judge ought to determine the arbitrability of a matter, rather than the arbitrator essentially deciding his/her own fate. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am by Schachtman
Requirements Imposed By State Licensing Boards and Medical Professional Societies The involvement of medical professionals in disciplining physicians for dubious litigation testimony, whether through state licensing authorities or voluntary medical associations, raises some difficult questions: Does a physician’s rendering an opinion on a medical issue in litigation, such as diagnosing silicosis, asbestosis, welding-induced encephalopathy, or fenfluramine-related cardiac… [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 6:48 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
United States, a case involving the “anti-harboring” provision in Alabama’s 2011 immigration law, which made it a crime to help undocumented immigrants enter or live in the state. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 2:32 pm by John Elwood
United States overruled United States v. [read post]