Search for: "United States v. Minor" Results 4261 - 4280 of 7,098
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2013, 4:17 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
United States, 431 U.S. 324, (1977) -- “dooms the plaintiffs’ request for certification under Rule 23(b)(2). [read post]
29 May 2013, 11:46 am by Kate Fort
While the structure and ideology of international human rights law is such that the interests of tribes (and tribal members) are almost always subordinated to the interests of aspirant members and the public, CANZUS states (the affluent western settler states of Canada, Australia, New Zealand and the United States) have been able to augment domestic human rights law in order to provide normative space for tribal self-constitution. [read post]
29 May 2013, 3:18 am
Consequences for International Law Milena Sterio, A Tale of Two States: Territoriality and Minority Rights in Kosovo and Georgia Alena Douhan, CIS, CSTO and the United Nations: Could an Active Regional System of Collective Security Be Established? [read post]
28 May 2013, 9:53 am by Florian Mueller
A week ago the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued its opinion in a snowplow patent case, Douglas Dynamics, LLC v. [read post]
16 May 2013, 11:08 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
While most countries accept the return of their citizens if the United States orders them deported, several refuse to take back them back, either because of a lack of formal relations with the U.S. [read post]
16 May 2013, 6:47 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
It also modifies the injunction that entered after the district court found that the hiring tests have had a disparate impact on black applicants.The case is United States v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 9:42 am by Florian Mueller
The Florida case is a rare exception in which a delay is convenient for Apple.The next Apple-Google trial in the United States is now (absent another rescheduling) going to be held in October 2013. [read post]
9 May 2013, 2:54 pm by Florian Mueller
However, the European Commission's preliminary assessment is that the license agreement underlying that rate-setting case came into being under anticompetitive circumstances, calling into question whether there even is an enforceable agreement in place.Alternatively to a process in Germany, Google "suggest[ed] the [arbitration] panel [in the United States] employ a 'baseball arbitration' procedure to resolve any areas in which the parties are unable to reach agreement" (emphasis… [read post]
8 May 2013, 8:28 am by Terry Hart
It argues that “U.S. federal court lacks jurisdiction over Megaupload” because it “is a wholly foreign corporation; it is not incorporated in the United States, and it has no agents or offices in the United States. [read post]
6 May 2013, 5:16 am by Susan Brenner
Brief of the United States U.S. v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 3:57 am by Steve Vladeck
Next Thursday, the Supreme Court will decide whether or not to grant certiorari in United States v. [read post]