Search for: "United States v. Robert" Results 4261 - 4280 of 9,865
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2017, 9:02 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Not necessarily.Rumors have been circulating that the new EO will apply the same criteria as EO 13769 but expressly exempt green card holders, student visa holders, and other people with substantial contacts with the United States. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 3:00 am by NCC Staff
About two-thirds of them were Japanese-Americans who were born in the United States. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 2:46 am by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch Another interesting en banc petition by Robert Greenspoon and Phil Mann: Cascades Projection v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 9:30 am by Jordan Brunner
Foreign Policy, in conjunction with Air Wars, reports that the United States used depleted uranium weapons on the battlefield in airstrikes against ISIS despite promises that it would not do so. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 10:23 am by Jordan Brunner
Reuters reports that the United States strongly believes that the killing was ordered by Kim Jong Un. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 8:34 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
Jackson's dissent in Terminiello v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
In the Kentucky Law Journal, law student Jordan Shewmaker looks at Honeycutt v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Is There a Thumb on the Scale in Refugee Convention Appellate Court Adjudication in the United States? [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 3:39 pm by Micah Belden
On March 2, 1942, the petitioner, therefore, had notice that, by Executive Order, the President, to prevent espionage and sabotage, had authorized the Military to exclude him from certain areas and to prevent his entering or leaving certain areas without permission. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 4:40 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Ilya Shapiro weighs in on Lee v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 3:09 pm by Deborah Pearlstein
Texas); and rejected (unanimously) the continued vitality of much-cited dicta from the Court’s 1934’s United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 10:26 am by Ed Stein
” The President did not provide much detail regarding why, as the EO concluded, “these actions constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Justice Scalia expressed his view forcefully in a dissent in the 2001 case of United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 3:27 pm by Jamie Baker
Its more than 2,700 members practice throughout the United States, Canada and other foreign countries. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 11:36 am by Peter Margulies
Explaining this extreme form of deference, Justice Robert Jackson, author of the canonical Youngstown concurrence on separation of powers, observed in Harisiades v. [read post]