Search for: "DAVIE v. STATE"
Results 4281 - 4300
of 5,708
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2016, 5:30 am
In the wonderful case of Sopo v. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 8:00 am
It then remitted the matter to the Comptroller for further proceedings “not inconsistent with this Court's decision; and, as so modified, confirmed” the Comptroller decision. * See, also, the decision in Davis (Niagara Falls Hous. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 5:30 am
In the wonderful case of Sopo v. [read post]
4 Jan 2015, 9:03 am
A legal challenge to S.1 of DRIPA by MPs David Davis and Tom Watson is under way. [read post]
24 Sep 2024, 5:01 am
From McMurtrie v. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 12:09 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 10:47 am
Also, the Court has yet to set a Conference for the rescheduled Davis v. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 10:40 am
Another related case was Davis v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 12:42 am
On 18 March 2015, Nicola Davies J heard an application in the case of Lachaux v AOL Ltd. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 1:11 pm
State v. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 1:46 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 6:27 am
State of Nevada v. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 12:07 pm
Valdosta State Univ. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 6:37 am
Perhaps there were occasional cases of this sort (and if there were, under the doctrine of Davis v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 5:09 am
Second Circuit Decision Underscores Importance of Indenture Terms Below is news of a development from Davis Polk (as culled from this memo): In a recent Second Circuit decision, Law Debenture Trust Co. of New York v. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 8:24 pm
Davis v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 7:08 am
In Béland , supra , McIntyre J., speaking about the inadmissibility of a polygraph test, cited at p. 415 Davie v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 4:27 am
(See Aaron v Roemer. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 7:22 am
King Fourth Amendment: Davis v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 11:39 am
Lord Hoffman has in fact stated that the legislative reforms have served to “free the Courts from technical considerations of legal right and to confer a wide power (to do what is fair)…” – O’Neill v. [read post]
