Search for: "Held v. State"
Results 4281 - 4300
of 82,195
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2010, 5:18 pm
On June 29, 2010, the New Jersey State Supreme Court held in State v. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 7:09 am
Schoenefeld’s fundamental right to practice law and that the state “failed to establish either a substantial state interest advanced by [the statute], or a substantial relationship between the statute and that interest” [Schoenefeld v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 9:01 am
United States, 391 U.S. 123, 135-37 (1968), the Supreme Court held that the admission of a co-defendant's confession implicating the defendant is reversible error where the codefendant did not testify and the co-defendant and defendant are jointly tried. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 10:17 am
State of Illinois. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
In the Matter of New York Civil Liberties Union v. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
In the Matter of New York Civil Liberties Union v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:15 am
Co. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 3:11 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 12:00 am
In Kahler v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 6:28 am
Campbell v. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 7:50 am
§1446(b) (the federal class action removal statute).Analysis: The Court relied on the proposition in Koehnen v. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 6:38 am
In Prince v. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 8:42 am
Here: Wisconsin v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 8:58 pm
Magnetek, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 7:54 am
Supreme Court reversed the precedent-setting decision in Connecticut v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 9:18 am
[N]either Linder [v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 4:05 am
"Thus, concluded the Appellate Division, the Department failed to comply with its own stated obligation to provide Toolasprashad with the required notice of the time and place of the disciplinary hearing. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 6:58 am
" See Griswold v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 4:10 pm
In the case of Donaldson v United Kingdom ([2011] ECHR 210) the Fourth Section held that the application of a serving Republican prisoner alleging a violation of his rights under Article 10 and Article 14 (discrimination) was inadmissible. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 2:07 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Cortez Byrd Chips, Inc. v. [read post]