Search for: "In re A. V." Results 4281 - 4300 of 62,914
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2009, 11:47 am
One prosecutor asked: "You're saying that [they're] going on the stand, swearing an oath to testify to the truth and then lying . . . ? [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 1:00 am
If you’re practising in this field and want to know more, the IPKat suggests you quench your thirst from the source, which is Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc v Kymab Ltd & Anor [2016] EWHC 87 (Pat).The invention relates to modifying a mouse genome by swapping out specific segments and replacing them with a human gene segments. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 12:35 pm
  (Read the opinion for details; I won't post the comments here because they're racist in the extremis.) [read post]
13 May 2008, 11:46 am
Just because you've got the votes to take the case en banc doesn't mean you're going to win once it gets there. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 1:13 pm
  But the Court of Appeal seems exactly right when it says that if you record all the calls, you pretty much know for sure that you're going to record confidential calls, so you're liable. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 11:29 am
 But you're allowed to sue two different parties in two different lawsuits. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 1:43 pm
 Now, if you'd have let the thing collapse, yeah, you're covered.But you're an idiot. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 2:10 pm
 I mean, you're probably going to get sued for that.But it gets worse.Not satisfied when each of the workers says they're not responsible -- having had the supervisor scream "Are you on your period?! [read post]