Search for: "STATE V. POWERS"
Results 4281 - 4300
of 41,364
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2019, 7:26 am
In Texas Instruments Inc. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 3:00 pm
First, it reiterates its Spending Clause argument: because the IDEA was enacted pursuant to Congress's Spending Clause power, it must provide clear notice of any conditions that are attached to a state's acceptance of federal funds. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 3:09 am
On appeal from: [2013] EWCA Civ 192 The cases concerned the police’s power to collect and retain electronic data about individuals. [read post]
11 May 2018, 8:58 am
The case is Doe v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 8:58 am
The case is Doe v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 11:30 am
Here is the abstract: In 1934, in the midst of the Depression, the United States Supreme Court, in Home Building & Loan Ass’n v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 4:14 pm
And wouldn’t it be particularly odd to infer plenary power by state leg [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 4:00 am
In Louisiana Department of Justice v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 4:00 am
The common denominator across multiple opinions in the last two years is that they concentrate power in one place: the Supreme Court.One striking example of this power grab is a case from a few years ago, Trinity Lutheran v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 7:28 am
Here is the complaint in United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
Trump v. [read post]
When Congress Giveth, is the Dormant Commerce Clause Taken Away?--Free Speech Coalition v. Shurtleff
7 Apr 2007, 12:12 pm
Congress, not the states, can regulate interstate commerce - but Congress can, if it wants to, delegate its power to the states to do what they couldn't otherwise do. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 2:51 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) RO, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 2910 (22 November 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Rahmatullah v Secretary of State for Foreign & Commonwealth Affairs & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 1540 (14 December 2011) Spaceright Europe Ltd v Baillavoine & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 1565 (14 December 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Norman v Cheshire Fire & Rescue Service [2011] EWHC 3305 (QB) (14 December… [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 4:27 am
Here is the abstract: Conventional wisdom holds that federal law’s conferring banking powers on national banks presumptively preempts state laws seeking to control the exercise of those powers. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 11:16 am
" This time, in Delhaize America, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 12:34 pm
Brewer, Governor of the State of Arizona, v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 9:03 am
Further, the Court decided McQuiggin v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 12:10 pm
If there is an undercount, a state may end up losing power and wealth. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 8:37 am
In 1995, in Celotex v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 3:23 pm
United States v. [read post]
