Search for: "State v. E. E. B." Results 4281 - 4300 of 10,079
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
Freedom of Information The Panopticon blog has published some transparency related updates which will have a potential impact on (a) the engagement of exemptions under FOIA and the EIR, and (b) the public interest balance. [read post]
10 May 2016, 5:10 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly determined that the proceeding was barred by the statute of limitations.* 8 NYCRR 30-1.8(b) provides for tenure areas of: (4) school media specialist; (5) school media specialist (library); and (6) school media specialist (educational communications)** Presumably Garofano’s name was placed on the preferred list for School Media Specialist (Educational Communications) created as the result of the layoff.The decision is posted on the Internet… [read post]
4 May 2016, 6:44 am by Bill Marler
To improve surveillance, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists has recommended that all L. monocytogenes isolates be forwarded to state public health laboratories for subtyping through the National Molecular Subtyping Network for Foodborne Disease Surveillance (PulseNet). [read post]
3 May 2016, 5:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  A plaintiff whose PII, PFI, or PPI was stolen by hackers typically brings suit against the hacked company on his or her own behalf and on behalf of a class of similarly situated people, hoping the presiding court will certify the proposed class and allow the case to proceed as a class action.[3]  Causes of action in customer cases run a wide gamut of legal theories, from traditional tort claims (negligence and fraud) to allegations of state and federal statutory violations (for… [read post]
2 May 2016, 11:44 am by Olivier Moréteau
Garske, (United States)·         Good Faith, United in Diversity? [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 9:49 pm
Since the IRS is not a party to this proceeding and in any event would not be bound by any determination of this court under Commissioner v. [read post]