Search for: "Strong v. United States"
Results 4281 - 4300
of 6,640
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2019, 6:43 am
In United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 5:42 am
Section 253(8), for example, states that a technical capability notice “may be given to persons outside the United Kingdom (and may require things to be done, or not to be done, outside the United Kingdom). [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 9:13 am
United Servs. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 12:55 am
Stewart J held there would be strong reasons for not enforcing the exclusive foreign jurisdiction clause even if it were incorporated and enforceable: Karpik v Carnival plc (The Ruby Princess) (Stay Application) [2021] FCA 1082; (2021) 157 ACSR 1, [331]. [read post]
3 May 2020, 7:19 am
On appeal, Edwards argues that his conviction must be reversed and rendered because section 97-45-17 is unconstitutionally overbroad in violation of the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and unconstitutionally vague in violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 9:42 am
United States. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 8:12 am
Hearkening back to my original point, the Canadian trend in spousal support in no way resembles the burgeoning alimony reform sweeping through the United States. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 1:24 pm
Like any polymer, DNA is made up of repeating monomer units, connected by chemical bonds to form one larger molecule. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 2:03 pm
. . . .V. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 4:23 am
Koh's landmark FTC v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 7:00 am
Since then, subsequent additions to the official History of the Supreme Court of the United States have been famously unpunctual, uneven, and mostly unheralded. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 9:41 am
The AIA, Its Preclusion Statutes, and Cuozzo’s Path to the Supreme Court The 2011 America Invents Act (AIA) created new patent reviews within the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO): inter partes review (IPR), post-grant review (PGR), and covered business method review (CBM). [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 1:08 am
Section 929P(b)(2) provide extraterritorial effect for these types actions when certain defined types of conduct take place in the United States or when it takes place outside the United States with a foreseeable effect in the U.S. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 9:44 am
It is worth noting, however, that the Government intends to press ahead with the proposal despite noting that opinion was "evenly divided" and that "there were strong reactions to this question" (para 3.1). [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 9:44 am
It is worth noting, however, that the Government intends to press ahead with the proposal despite noting that opinion was "evenly divided" and that "there were strong reactions to this question" (para 3.1). [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 2:45 am
Samsung’s design patent case is looking like a strong contender for grant of certiorari. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 5:36 pm
I am delighted to share the video recording of the event recently sponsored by the Penn State Law Federalist Society: "Natural Law and the US Constitutional Order" which was held at Penn State law 12 April 2022. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 3:37 pm
Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 12:08 pm
” Roberts immediately remarked that “‘commandeer’ is strong language. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 11:02 am
That said, I also see serious issues in Huawei v. [read post]
