Search for: "Taylor v. Taylor" Results 4281 - 4300 of 4,755
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
The Brett Wilson Media Law Blog has an article summarising and commenting on the 30 March 2022 judgment of Chief Constable of Kent Police & Anor v Taylor [2022] EWHC 737 (QB), in which Saini J allowed a claim for breach of confidence arising from the Defendant’s refusal to delete videos that a law firm that had accidentally disclosed to him and which contained sensitive information about a vulnerable minor. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
IPSO Satisfactory Remedy – 18621-23 Booley v ok.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – satisfactory remedy 18524-23 Barnwell v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 18355-23 A complainant v nationalworld.com, 14 Confidential sources (2021), No breach – after investigation Satisfactory Remedy – 17293-23 Reynolds v swindonadvertiser.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – satisfactory remedy 18392-23 Marshall De… [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 12:04 pm by Elizabeth McElvein, Benjamin Wittes
Circuit action has taken place in the case of Trump v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 12:49 am by Ben Reeve-Lewis
, with his gift to landlords all, the case of Spencer v Taylor ably covered by Tessa earlier this week so I wont labour the point here. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 3:37 am by SHG
From the perspective of a police officer, as the law requires the shooting be considered under Graham v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 3:36 am
Taylor, Gillette, Wyoming; Thomas P. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 4:37 pm
”This element – seniority – cannot be diminished or impaired by the terms of collective bargaining agreement as demonstrated by City of Plattsburgh v Local 788, 108 AD2d 1045.In Plattsburgh the issue concerned the application of a Taylor Law contract provision dealing with seniority of employees in the classified service in a layoff situation.The collective bargaining agreement between Plattsburgh and the Union provided if there were to be demotions in connection… [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 4:24 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
To ease the burden on civil servants, several Committee members, citing Justice Stewart’s “I know it when I see it” commentary in the landmark case of Jacobellis v. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 5:53 pm by John Bellinger
Although the panel held that the ATS did apply extraterritorially to cover plaintiffs’ claims, it nonetheless remanded the case to the district court to determine whether the suit presented a non-justiciable political question in light of the Fourth Circuit’s decision in Taylor v. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 4:12 pm
As Stuart Taylor remarked on the NewsHour: "You fire the U.S. attorney because you want him to do more death penalty cases, that's fine. [read post]