Search for: "Bare v. Bare"
Results 4301 - 4320
of 5,017
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2010, 12:14 pm
The case of Maqaleh, et al., v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 10:44 am
But when the patentee goes on the attack, the fur bristles, the cat is twice the size with teeth bared and eyes ablaze". [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 5:25 pm
ª de la LES, matizando que se instaurará, vía desarrollo reglamentario, un procedimiento cautelar, a ventilar en un plazo inferior a un mes de duración, dónde la Comisión de Propiedad Intelectual se encuentra legitimada para bloquear páginas de enlaces o retirar el contenido ilícito. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:23 am
Canal Digitaal v C.V.B.A. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 7:23 am
It is another indication, after the opinion earlier this month in Francis v. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 6:51 am
The case is Rutherford v. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 6:52 am
In a post titled Dickens's 1842 Reading Tour: Launching the Copyright Question in Tempestuous Seas , Philip V. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 3:55 am
In their article, the authors retrace the ECtHR's case law on the extraterritorial application of the Convention and establish patterns on how the ECtHR and the UK courts have dealt with international law norms potentially competing with the Convention.In the same section, Marko Milanovic writes about a somewhat related issue, about which he has already published extensively: 'The Human Rights Committee’s Views in Sayadi v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 2:19 pm
The first case to be tried under the new law was United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 2:29 pm
In Avery v. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 6:02 pm
The Supreme Court will hear argument in Briscoe v. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 5:04 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 6:36 am
Bishop v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 3:44 pm
Some years ago, someone thought up a new wheeze: simply describe the body which it is sought to protect as a 'superior court of record' and then assert loudly that the nature of such a court was that it could not be judicially reviewed; all rather reminiscent of the old South African line that Parliament could be declared a court so as to allow a bare majority to change the constitution (Minister of the Interior v Harris 1952 (4) SA 769). [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 4:28 am
" Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of Law says it is "a small trace or barely perceptible amount of something. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 4:00 am
In Smith v Smith the Court of Appeal considered the conflict between TOLATA and its family law jurisdiction. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 6:05 pm
Cleary Building Corp. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 5:00 am
In 2002 the Supreme Court ruled in Atkins v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 4:07 am
Ord v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm
Click Here Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
