Search for: "People v David S." Results 4301 - 4320 of 5,862
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2023, 4:27 am by Emma Snell
According to a Telegram post by David Arakhamia, leader of President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s party in parliament, Maj. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 7:45 am by INFORRM
” Solicitor-advocate David Price QC, who acted for reality television star Imogen Thomas in the recent privacy case CTB v News Group, said he favoured a disobedient press at the cost of privacy intrusion. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 8:20 am
This comes from Pearson v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 3:22 pm by Gary P. Rodrigues
Sharpe and Patricia McMahonMisconceptions: Unmarried Motherhood and the Children of Unmarried Parents Act by Lori ChambersThe Alberta Supreme Court at 100: History & Authority edited by Jonathan SwaingerMy Life in Crime and Other Academic Adventures by Martin Friedland 2006Magistrates, Police & People: Everyday Criminal Justice in Quebec and Lower Canada, 1764-1837 by Donald FysonThe Court of Queen’s Bench of Manitoba 1870- 1950: A Biographical History by Dale… [read post]
21 Nov 2006, 7:48 pm
Demner, The Nuclear Terrorism Convention: Will Detainees Be Classified as "Enemy Combatants" by the United States Harvard Law Review, Volume 120, Number 1, November 2006 Neal Kumar Katyal, Hamdan v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 6:18 am by Bill Raftery
The threats to impeach 4 Iowa Supreme Court justices for their same-sex marriage decision (Varnum v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
McInnes devotes an entire chapter to Hughes’ judicial role in the notorious case of Thatcher v Thatcher. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 4:58 am by Emma Snell
  China’s Peoples Liberation Army (PLA) conducted “live-fire exercises” on Saturday in Pingtan, a coastal area about 125km from Taiwan. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 4:57 am by Joanna L. Grossman
”This entire statute was struck down by the Supreme Court’s ruling in Roe v. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 6:05 am
Part of the problem, no doubt is that confusing decision of the Supreme Court in Philip Morris v. [read post]