Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 4301 - 4320
of 19,839
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2017, 4:13 pm
The claimant stated that this did not happen. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 9:16 am
ULF Bamberg v. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:15 am
Small Business Capital Corp., Mark Feathers; Investors Prime Fund, LLC; and SBC Portfolio Fund, LLC.Case number: 12-cv-3237 (United States District Court for the Northern District of California)Case filed: June 21, 2012Qualifying judgment/order: November 6, 2013 11/21/2013 02/19/2014 2013-105 SEC v. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 4:22 am
Sotelo v. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 7:05 am
") (internal quotation marks and citation omitted); United States v. [read post]
21 May 2013, 7:49 am
In Metrish v. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 3:40 am
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 7:50 am
Florida, United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2021, 8:08 am
Brittex, not Dollar, was the first to use that mark in connection with pawn brokerage and pawn shop services, said the court, and the Board provided no support for the notion that a registrant has priority as to a specific service it was second to offer just because it was first to offer a different specific service (Brittex Financial, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 2:01 pm
Vullo decision, where it held that the NRA had stated a claim for impermissible censorship due to government jawboning. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 2:35 am
The University of South Carolina v. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 2:30 am
Be that as it may, here's Tim's take on what Arnold J's decision has achieved, how they go about dealing with the same phenomenon in the United States -- and where we might go from here:Richemont v BskyB and others: a national solution to a global problem? [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 4:14 am
Also in The National Law Review, Mark Salzberg discusses last week’s oral argument in Czyzewski v. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
Being unsure whether allowing exploitation of works without prior permission from the relevant rightholder is permitted, the French Council of State has just sought guidance from the CJEU. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 1:21 am
Clark International Limited v. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 3:30 am
Coach Servs., Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 6:42 am
” (Matel v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 6:42 am
” (Matel v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 6:42 am
” (Matel v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 10:07 am
Judge Karen V. [read post]
