Search for: "State v. Race" Results 4301 - 4320 of 8,689
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2020, 7:15 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Some, such as Titles II and VI, enacted altogether new laws while others, such as Titles I and V, amended earlier federal civil rights laws. [read post]
4 Sep 2006, 12:54 am
With that stated, however, very few state cases have been received at this point and things may well change. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 12:00 am by My name
[xiii] An excellent discussion of the legislative history and Congressional intent of this statute is discussed in United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 6:54 am by Marissa Miller
At this blog and the Volokh Conspiracy, Professor Orin Kerr examines the second question presented in United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2022, 11:13 am by Gene Takagi
May help for state law (e.g., property tax exemption) and fundraising purposes. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 12:55 pm
The Court stated “For purposes of Ohio’s charitable-use property-tax exemption, the provision of medical or ancillary healthcare services qualifies as charitable if those services are provided on a nonprofit basis to those in need, without regard to race, creed or ability to pay. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 9:15 am
The latest civil rights assault comes in a new lawsuit filed in Texas by five states and several religiously affiliated health care organizations, Franciscan Alliance v. [read post]
1 Oct 2017, 10:46 am by Benton Martin, E.D. Mich.
By a vote of 2 to 1, the Sixth Circuit refused this week, in United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 2:31 pm by Meagan Burrows
The ACLU has blocked all of these abortion bans from taking effect, and abortion is still legal in all 50 states. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 12:26 pm by Florian Mueller
There's an undeniable asymmetry here, and it's not only due to the fact that Samsung won the race to the ITC and that an import ban is the ITC's standard remedy.August 9 will be the most important Apple v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 2:31 pm by Paul A. Prados
  More importantly, the Defense of Marriage Act decision struck down a key component of DOMA in United States v. [read post]