Search for: "U.S. v. Mark" Results 4301 - 4320 of 11,358
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2017, 10:00 pm
These consumers allege that this caused “significant anticompetitive effects including restraining or eliminating competition sold directly to U.S. consumers and fixing, raising or maintaining the price of contact lenses sold online at artificially high levels. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 3:07 am
On the other side of the Atlantic, how should U.S. trademark holders protect their marks in the fast-changing economy that is Cuba? [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
Supreme Court, overcoming a historic Democratic blockade by changing the rules of the U.S. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 9:30 am by azatty
The majority opinion stated, in part, that ‘[w]hatever our personal feelings about the mark at issue here, or other disparaging marks, the First Amendment forbids government regulators to deny registration because they find speech likely to offend others. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed in U.S. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 2:54 am by Broc Romanek
District Court entered final judgment in National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 3:14 pm by Jordan Brunner
Prosecutor Army Colonel Robert Swann jumps to it, continuing his direct examination of an anonymous U.S. army captain from yesterday. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 4:37 am by SHG
” You wouldn’t get this out of Mark Joseph Stern’s post at Slate. [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 4:45 am by Jordan Brunner
Mark Warner, in which they pledged to go wherever the intelligence may lead. [read post]