Search for: "UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE" Results 4301 - 4320 of 6,104
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2024, 7:26 am by Holly
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and in foreign trademark offices, including lawyers who have served as USPTO examiners. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 12:36 pm by Gene Quinn
After the conclusion of the aforementioned litigation in Colorado, the United States Patent and Trademark office canceled both claims 1 and 19 of the ‘774 patent at the conclusion of an ex parte reexamination. e.Digital did obtain new claim 33, which recites the limitations of cancelled claims 1 and 19, including the identical sole memory limitation. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 10:05 am by davidferriero
Embassy in London to United States Secretary of State, October 3, 1957. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 2:23 pm by Florian Mueller
I just saw this joint policy paper by the United States Department of Justice and the United States Patent and Trademark Office on "remedies for standards-essential patents subject to voluntary F/RAND commmitments", and while there are some passages in it that I like, I think these two government agencies should have refrained from stating a position at all if for whatever political considerations they weren't able to… [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 7:18 am by James Yang
If you want to file a trademark application on your own, you can do so at the Apply Online page of the United States Patent and Trademark Office website. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 11:10 am
According to this theory, a patent can only be prior art if it satisfies the fiction that it would have been available as of an earlier filing date but for delays in the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 1:00 pm by Mike Mireles
  Theranos’ 200 plus US patent portfolio is public information via the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) portal and a significant corporate investment in IP. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 9:36 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
We have absolutely no intention of substituting the judgment of any foreign person for the judgment of the United States Patent and Trademark Office examiner, OK. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 12:50 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Rai Duke University School of Law; Duke Innovation & Entrepreneurship Initiative Abstract This is a brief of 72 IP professors opposing the claim in Oil States that the IPR procedure is unconstitutional.Petitioner argues that only a court – indeed, only a jury – has the power to decide that the United States Patent and Trademark Office erred in granting a patent. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 5:03 pm by Frances Drummond (AU)
The current position in the United States Section 2(a) of the US Lanham (Trademark) Act provides that no trade mark shall be refused registration unless it, inter alia, “consists of or comprises immoral, deceptive, or scandalous matter; or matter which may disparage”. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 5:03 pm by Frances Drummond (AU)
The current position in the United States Section 2(a) of the US Lanham (Trademark) Act provides that no trade mark shall be refused registration unless it, inter alia, “consists of or comprises immoral, deceptive, or scandalous matter; or matter which may disparage”. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 9:20 am by Dennis Crouch
Lee, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, No. 15-326 I/P Engine, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 7:32 am by Florian Mueller
Ten days ago, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit granted summary affirmance (i.e., summary judgment at the appellate stage) of Judge Koh's decision to let Apple collect $450 million from Samsung (against a bond posted years ago) even though one of the patents underlying the related ruling had been held invalid by an in-house court (PTAB) of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 5:30 am by Paul D. Swanson
  In addition to being a former Boeing engineer, Gardner is a patent attorney and former patent examining attorney for the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
11 May 2010, 4:53 am by Jeffrey Vicq
  Many of my clients were concerned about a line of United States cases, decided over the last several years, that regarded innocent filing errors in applications, renewal forms, and other correspondence with the US Patent and Trademark Office as attempts to perpetrate a fraud on the Office, justifying refusal, expungement, or some other highly punitive penalty. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 11:17 am by Holly Brezee
For example, on March 6, 2022, the Kremlin issued a decree that essentially grants a no-cost license to steal patents held by owners in “unfriendly” countries, including the United States and the United Kingdom. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 9:13 am by Joy Waltemath
In addition to the Rules of Professional Conduct regulating the legal profession, he was also required to follow professional rules promulgated by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 8:33 am by Florian Mueller
I wouldn't necessarily call it a "sea change" because it's not like SEP holders had easy access to injunctive relief before, but there's certainly been a wave of high-profile decisions (such as the one made by Judge Posner in a case involving Apple and Motorola Mobility) because of so many recent SEP cases:"In the last year alone, the Department of Justice, the Federal Trade Commission, the Patent and Trademark Office, the United States Court of Appeals… [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 2:45 am by Dennis Crouch
Lee, No. 15-716 (Can the Patent and Trademark Office appropriately apply the “broadest reasonable interpretation” standard in construing patent claims in post-grant validity challenges?) [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 5:03 am
***Of other issues with the Lemley/Moore paper, see PATENT GRANT RATES AT THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE [read post]