Search for: "US Inventor"
Results 4301 - 4320
of 7,114
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2016, 4:44 pm
Specifically, the government only needs to be able to observe 1) the social value of a given pharmaceutical and 2) the frequency of its use. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 2:59 pm
While he withheld his patent, the public learned from independent inventors all that it could teach. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 4:06 pm
We’ve seen this problem before, in which the Patent Office awards a patent not to the first proven inventor, but to the first applicant who describes a task using technological and legal jargon that patent professionals respect. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 3:37 am
| US Supreme Court uses TC Heartland to blunt key troll tool, but will California welcome the next wave of troll litigation? [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 2:26 pm
Today's announcement should dissuade anyone from using DES. [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 2:24 am
Is the use of a printing technique a 'treatment'? [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 10:58 am
If inventing were that easy everyone would be a filthy rich inventor! [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 1:02 am
My thoughts and questions brought a response from Peter Pappas, in Tax Happiness: Inventors of Sauna Happier than Inventors of Polio Vaccine. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 3:13 am
Kolcraft did not need to prove use for every instance of method claim infringement in order to be awarded damages. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 1:33 am
Brett Troutpatent inventor patent lawyer [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 6:30 am
Given that "post grant review" would be used A LOT MORE than interference proceedings, there is the possibility of a lot more people needed if this patent reform bill passes. [read post]
10 May 2009, 1:04 am
http://images.businessweek.com/ss/09/04/0422_inventive_cities/4.htm Also reported in this issue, for the first time, foreign applicants secured more US patents than did American applicants last year "due mostly to an upsurge in patents to inventors in Japan, South Korea, and China": http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/content/apr2009/id20090422_521441.htm Hat tip to Patent Hawk for spotting these articles first… [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 6:56 am
Good for corporations, not so much inventors. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 11:20 am
Further, these two steps are the ones always almost used to detect particular DNA. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 6:14 am
File-sharer will take RIAA case to Supreme Court http://ow.ly/dDYIB Interesting article on the visuals of branding | Why it’s the visuals that hammer home the message http://ow.ly/dDWHY Lancôme Warned on Wrinkle-Cream Marketing http://ow.ly/dDY5c Apple Patents May Point to What’s Next for IPhone http://ow.ly/dDYGv Why clearance for marketing materials is important | Nova Scotia musician warned by Mint for using pennies on CD cover… [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 11:48 pm
However, the applicant – originally the inventor Robert D Arnott, and subsequently the assignee, Research Affiliates LLC – had filed a divisional application with slightly different claims, and the appeal was placed on-hold pending a decision on this further application. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 1:54 pm
Would I get into trouble using his name and biographical details, or should I fictionalize the man out of all recognition? [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 5:19 pm
Hopefully I provided a lot of useful information about patent, trademark and copyright law. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 7:56 am
The Supreme Court held that the so-called “machine or transformation” test is useful, but not a strict requirement for patentability. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 6:40 pm
The second is a set of sample forms; checklists; and client-memos -- a version of which should be used by every patent practitioner in handling client relations. [read post]
