Search for: "United States v. District Court" Results 4301 - 4320 of 34,626
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2013, 1:23 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 8:53 am
The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in 8 cases this morning. [read post]
17 May 2013, 7:36 am by Greg Mersol
  But since then, in 2011 the United States Supreme Court decided Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 7:21 pm by Ben Allen
In the author's experience, the Government is seeking appellate waivers, either fully or in part, at an increasing rate in plea negotiations.In United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 8:02 am by Beth Graham
In a case of first impression, the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court’s refusal to confirm a foreign arbitral award due to lack of personal jurisdiction. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 7:36 am
In a recent decision, Judge Otero of the United States District Court for the Central District of California granted summary judgment of no unenforceability on defendant's inequitable conduct claim. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 10:35 pm by Patricia Salkin
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin granted the County’s summary judgment motion and the owner appealed. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 5:17 pm by Jeffrey M. Goldstein
Childress United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida October 7, 2020, Decided; October 7, 2020, Entered on Docket Case No. 19-CV-61153-RUIZ/STRAUSS Excerpts of the Case: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION THIS CAUSE came before me upon Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff’s [(“Defendant Childress'”)] Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs (DE 83) (the “Motion”). [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 10:00 pm by Nietzer
On Septemeber 15, 2011, an Indiana United States District Court found that a reasonable jury could find that employee, a 63-year old employee at Knauf GmbH (“Knauf”), a German company, was terminated because of his age and his claims under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 10:00 pm by Nietzer
On Septemeber 15, 2011, an Indiana United States District Court found that a reasonable jury could find that employee, a 63-year old employee at Knauf GmbH (“Knauf”), a German company, was terminated because of his age and his claims under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 12:07 pm by Kate Fort
The Department contends that the United District Court’s order renders J.R.M. [read post]