Search for: "United States v. Minor"
Results 4301 - 4320
of 7,129
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2016, 8:30 am
Bush v. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 7:00 am
They were buoyed by Justice William Rehnquist’s 1985 dissent in Wallace v. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 8:21 am
§ 1182(f), which authorizes the president to bar entry of foreign nationals “detrimental to the interests of the United States. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 12:57 pm
A familiar sight for lawyersinvolved in TVCatchup suitsITV Broadcasting Limited, ITV 2 Limited, ITV Digital Channels Limited, Channel Four Television Corporation, 4 Ventures Limited, Channel 5 Broadcasting Limited and ITV Studios Limited v TVCatchup Limited (in administration), TVCatchup (UK) Limited and Media Resources Limited (a Mauritian company) [2015] EWCA Civ 204 is the latest development in the long-running copyright litigation saga which is usually known by its shorter name of ITV… [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:43 am
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2011/02/28/08-56349.pdf United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 5:57 am
The judge noted that while the 4th Amendment usually does not “apply to searches by foreign authorities in their own countries, even if the targets . . . are American citizens”, an exception applies “when the participation of United States agents in the investigation is so substantial that the action is a joint venture between the United States and foreign officials. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 7:43 am
Of last week’s 16 relists, the court dumped nearly half, including United States Forest Service v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 5:24 pm
In Apprendi v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 5:24 pm
In Apprendi v. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 4:40 pm
Sea Star Line, LLC, 06-606 QP: "Whether the Carmack Amendment applies to the inland leg of a multimodal shipment to a place in the United States from a place in a territory of the United States even if the inland carrier does not issue a separate bill of lading for the inland leg. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 5:00 am
State v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 6:54 am
Maryland and recently reaffirmed by a majority of Justices in United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 10:54 am
Both of these issues were addressed by Washington State Supreme Court in Putman v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
As of the time of trial, the state of the art did not include a genetic marker for SJS/TEN. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 4:36 pm
” To “defraud the United States” has a specific meaning under U.S. case law: According to Hammerschmidt v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 4:21 pm
United States, 391 U.S. 123 (1968), holding that an alleged statement by a co-defendant was not incriminating on its face to the defendant; that sufficient evidence supported the defendants’ convictions; and that because one of the defendants performed the same or similar role within the conspiracy as his codefendants, he was not less culpable than most other participants in his relative conduct, he was not entitled to a minor role reduction under §… [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 5:09 am
M and Others v. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 9:27 am
Heard, State v. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 11:15 am
Entertainment Merchants Ass’n (challenging, on First Amendment grounds, a California state ban on the sale of violent video games to minors) and Snyder v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 4:10 pm
Gore, United States v. [read post]
