Search for: "mark" Results 4301 - 4320 of 135,600
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2019, 11:08 am by Conrad B. Wilton
   For instance, Kagan notes the USPTO granted registration of marks to the Drug Abuse Resistance Education (D.A.R.E.) program while refusing to register the marks “BONG HITS 4 JESUS”, “YOU CAN’T SPELL HEALTHCARE WITHOUT THC”, and “MARIJUANA KOLA. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 12:08 am by IP Dragon
These provisions shall also apply when the essential partof the mark constitutes a reproduction of any such well-known mark or an imitation liable to create confusion therewith.(2) A period of at least five years from the date of registration shall be allowed for requesting the cancellation of such a mark. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 2:37 pm
  Infringement under Article 9(1)(a) [“double identity”: same mark, same goods and/or services]Here, Arnold J said, the burden is on the defendant to show the use does not affect or is not liable to affect the functions of the trade mark, and the DHL dictum makes sense. [read post]
11 Apr 2025, 6:15 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Here, Drive used “Med-Aire” as an individual product mark and also used a house mark on its products; that’s fine. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 7:19 am
Opposer Fallon licensed the mark to his company, Apnea Sciences Corporation, and was entitled to rely on the corporation's use of the mark to establish his "standing" and to prove priority. [read post]
11 May 2022, 5:33 am
The Board observed that a composite mark is unitary if the elements of the mark "are so merged together that they cannot be viewed as separable elements, . . . [read post]
12 Feb 2025, 4:26 am
Handal next claimed that the word TRUMP in this proposed mark "refers to deceased persons, Elizabeth Christ Trump and Fred Trump," not Donald Trump. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 4:21 am
Those specimens showed the SMILE MORE mark used with "The Official Smile More Store" and the "Roman Atwood Pranks" YouTube channel, and "clearly associate the SMILE MORE mark with Respondent. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 9:50 am
It states in its complaint that North American Master Lines was aware of the "northAmerican" marks and used them to profit from the consumer goodwill related to those marks. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 11:43 pm
"He causes all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hand or on their foreheads, and that no one may buy or sell except one who has the mark or the name of the beast, or the number of his name. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 10:50 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
This court holds that Rule 9(b)’s particularity requirement applies to false marking claims and that a complaint alleging false marking is insufficient when it only asserts conclusory allegations that a defendant is a “sophisticated company” and “knew or should have known” that the patent expired. [read post]
23 Nov 2024, 7:25 am by Jocelyn Bosse
The Court noted that:It is the obligation of the trade mark owner clearly to specify the goods in respect of which the mark is to be registered and thereby define the scope of the monopoly they claim. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
., a laborer at the mine, objected to biometric hand scanning to track time and attendance, believing that it involves the Mark of the Beast forbidden in the Book of Revelation. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 5:50 am
MARK LEVIN’S LIBERTY AND TYRANNY is still at #2 on the NYT Bestsellers List. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 9:22 am
07/08/09 The Recorder:California state Senator Mark Leno last week introduced legislation (SB 54) to recognize the validity of out-of-state marriages performed before November 5, 2008, when Prop. 8 became official. [read post]