Search for: "AMP, INC. v. United States" Results 4321 - 4340 of 11,017
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2009, 9:33 pm
For all of the reasons discussed here, here, and here, STL has not been a fan of the United States Olympic Committee’s efforts to enforce its near monopoly rights in the U.S. [read post]
11 Dec 2022, 9:56 am by Nedim Malovic
Furthermore, in the context of cancellation proceedings, the proprietor of an industrial property right, particularly an earlier mark, must establish that they may prohibit the use of the EU trade mark at issue, not only on the filing or priority date of that mark but also on the date on which EUIPO decides on the application for a declaration of invalidity (Style & Taste v EUIPO (T‑169/19) EU:T:2021:318).It therefore follows that, for the evidence of acquired… [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 7:30 am by Brian Garmo
Whether you agree with this holding on the basis of privacy or oppose it on the basis of freedom of information, the holding is not controlling in the United States. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
United States, 740 F.2d 1428, 1440 (8th Cir. 1984); Madsen v. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 6:48 pm
About 446 unit employees have Chinese surnames and were born in mainland China, Hong Kong, or Taiwan. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 1:16 am

 www.nylj.com
 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATESReal PropertyCity's Right to Impose Taxes, Liens on Properties Housing U.N. [read post]