Search for: "Companies A, B, and C" Results 4321 - 4340 of 12,893
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2010, 4:31 am by Sean Wajert
Respondents were asked to give jurisdictions a grade (A, B, C, D or F) in each of the following areas: Having and enforcing meaningful venue requirements; Overall treatment of tort and contract litigation; Treatment of class action suits and mass consolidation suits; Damages; Timeliness of summary judgment or dismissal; Discovery; Scientific and technical evidence; Judges’ impartiality; Judges’ competence; and Juries’… [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 1:23 pm by skelly
[The Business Times] Wefox Group, a Germany-based InsurTech firm, has successfully secured $125 million through its Series B funding round. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 3:00 am by Gonzalo E. Mon
NAD recommended that Liberty (a) use some mechanism to direct consumers’ attention to the disclosure; (b) place the language at the beginning of the disclosure, rather than at the end; and (c) ensure that the disclosure was large enough to be readable. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 5:43 pm by FDABlog HPM
By Ricardo Carvajal – Kellogg Company has agreed to FTC’s expansion of the settlement order that the company entered into in July 2009 regarding false claims that Frosted Mini-Wheats improve children’s attention (see our prior post here). [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 11:00 am by Brien Roche
  Attorneys are evaluated by Martindale-Hubbell as either A, B or C with A being the highest. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 10:44 am
 The Supreme Court’s decision (over 3 dissenters) hinged on its conclusion that (a) Congress intended, in the Copyright Act, to include re-transmission of over-the-air signals by “cable systems” as infringements of copyright; (b) given Aereo’s “overwhelming likeness” to cable systems, “the many similarities between Aereo and cable companies,” and the inability to “distinguish Aereo’s system from cable systems,”… [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 1:06 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
Therefore, a U.S. employer who receives such a call should contact immigration counsel prior to providing any information so that (a) the auditor’s name and credentials can be compared against the approved list; (b) counsel can be present on the call; (c) the employer can prepare adequately by reviewing the petition; and (d) the call can be documented appropriately. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 6:43 am by All Language Alliance, Inc.
The specific statement brought into question is that "eating just three-fourths of a cup of Cocoa Krispies will boost a family's immunity to illness" and that the brand "provides 25 percent of needed antioxidants and nutrients and is an excellent source of vitamins A, B, C and E". [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
But for yooze, yinz, and the rest of yas, here are a couple of highlights from the new resources: The Pregnancy Discrimination Act prohibits more than just discrimination against pregnant individuals, a company cannot discrimination against individuals who: (a) were pregnant; (b) could or intend to become pregnant; (c) have a medical condition that is related to pregnancy; or (d) had an abortion, or are considering having an abortion. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 8:18 am by Lauren Ellerman
Year 2001 - Contract B was signed - Non-Compete Agreement. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 1:15 pm by Michael Fox
Rapleaf's web site, the company discussed in the article, emphasizes that it is a marketing company, which is what the article really says about it, notwithstanding the headline. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 6:06 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
Therefore, a U.S. employer who receives such a call should contact immigration counsel prior to providing any information so that (a) the auditor's name and credentials can be compared against the approved list; (b) counsel can be present on the call; (c) the employer can prepare adequately by reviewing the petition; and (d) the call can be documented appropriately. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 8:33 am by Doug Leavitt
Thus, the Court held that the ABC test presumes that an individual is an employee unless the company can show that the individual meets the following three elements: (A) such individual has been and will continue to be free from control or direction over the performance of such service, both under his contract of service and in fact; and (B) such service is either outside the usual course of the business for which such service is performed, or that such service is… [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 12:29 pm
Martin, a Republican, supports adoption of rules that would require the two cable giants to (a) charge competitors less for programming, (b) stop forcing competitors to buy programming in "bundles", (c) lower prices for using their systems, and (d) let subscribers choose (and pay for) only the channels they want. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 4:22 am by Glenn Reynolds
He’s not very optimistic: Suckers: GM found a lot of them, even though a) by its own admission, it lacks “effective internal controls” over its finances; b) it’s still saddled with the UAW, which is already pledging ‘no more concessions’ and even making some trouble; c) its Opel subsidiary is hemorhaging money at a rate of billions a year; d) a high Opel official declared the IPO “premature” while noting that “there is still… [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 6:46 am by Barry Guryan
There were also “compromise” bills that sought to codify the non-compete law in Massachusetts in many ways, including: a) banning the use of non-competes for non-exempt workers; b) requiring advance notice and consideration for those who are required to sign a non-compete after starting employment; and c) creating presumptions addressing the reasonableness of the duration of the non-compete obligation and the scope of the activities that would be prohibited. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 6:39 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
Connections on social media platforms will be even more influential in the information we use to make decisions as whether to book a flight with airline A or B, or to trust our savings with bank C or D. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 1:56 am
This is another series of job eliminations by Boeing in California: "Boeing's confirmation of the Irvine closure comes three days after Boeing announced it was moving its C-130 Avionics Modernization Program and B-1 program operations in Long Beach to Oklahoma City eliminating 800 local jobs. [read post]