Search for: "Defendants A-F" Results 4321 - 4340 of 29,820
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2020, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Not a single member of the Court praised or defended the law at the oral argument or in the opinions. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 12:32 pm by Christine Corcos
He defended the interests of the church and promoted a wide variety of issues related to education. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 12:32 pm
He defended the interests of the church and promoted a wide variety of issues related to education. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 11:43 am by Brian L. Friedman
” To support their argument, the Insureds relied on dictionary definitions of “direct” as “[w]ithout intervening persons, conditions, or agencies; immediate;” and “physical” as pertaining to things “[o]f or pertaining to matter, or the world as perceived by the senses; material as [opposed] to mental or spiritual. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 1:11 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
., Nos. 17-2798-cv, 19-338, 19-404, 2020 WL 4743020, -- F.3d – (2d Cir. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 12:45 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Without comparative advertising, “injury to a particular competitor may be a small fraction of the defendant’s sales, profits, or advertising expenses. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 12:43 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
” For example, an anti-paparazzi statute protecting citizens “from unreasonable intrusions on personal privacy,” could have the “collateral effect of precluding the defendant from exploiting a photograph that falls within the subject matter of federal copyright law” without preemption, and a ban on falsity could likewise interfere with the exploitation of literary works containing falsehoods. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 10:48 am by Jon Sands
Valencia-Mendoza, 912 F.3d 1215 (9th Cir. 2019). [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 8:39 am
req=(title:18%20section:1344%20edition:prelim)%20OR%20(granuleid:USC-prelim-title18-section1344)&f=treesort&edition=prelim&num=0&jumpTo=trueRead More [read post]