Search for: "Fields v. A S"
Results 4321 - 4340
of 17,270
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2019, 1:10 pm
The first published case to determine the admissibility of expert testimony regarding retrograde extrapolation was State v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 11:42 am
It would also vitiate the silly outcome U.S. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 8:49 am
Facts: This case (Lough v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 8:00 am
Mitchell v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 9:20 pm
Raich and Kelo v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 8:49 pm
Ashcroft (later v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 8:34 pm
Abbott & Kristen Kortick Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 4:52 pm
Circuit and, in part, denied enforcement in a recent case, Scomas of Sausalito v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 12:20 pm
In McCleery v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 10:07 am
In Fessenden v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 1:54 am
Sequenom owns what are arguably some of the broadest patents in the NIPT field. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 4:54 am
Importantly, Chapter V of the GDPR authorizes only three methods for legal data transfers from the EEA to a third country, such as the United States: adequacy decisions, appropriate safeguards or limited enumerated exceptions (“derogations”). [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 8:58 pm
More recently, Gregory Shill of the University of Iowa College of Law describes in The Atlantic how the law effectively compels the use of the automobile, repeating the 1977 SCOTUS reference in Wooley v. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 8:53 am
This first pass at statistical significance is only mildly astray compared with the Bench Book’s more serious attempts to define statistical significance and confidence intervals: “4.10 Statistical Significance The research field agrees that study outcomes must demonstrate they are not the result of random chance. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 9:23 am
State v. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 9:23 am
State v. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 9:00 am
In which subject matter fields? [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 9:05 pm
Surrounded by 5-4 nail-biters, the 3-3-3 split generated by Virginia Uranium v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 5:16 pm
State v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 4:38 pm
On 2 July 2019, Advocate General (AG) Bobek delivered his opinion in Case C-240/18 P Constantin Film Produktion GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), advising that the EUIPO’s decision to reject the registration of the trade mark ‘Fack Ju Göhte’ because it was too offensive should be annulled. [read post]
