Search for: "Human v. State"
Results 4321 - 4340
of 19,139
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2010, 12:18 pm
” The settlement involved the medical expenses and costs recovered by the estate (and subject to the MSP statute), along with the non-medical, tort property claims of the surviving children for lost parental companionship, etc., under state law, (and not subject to the MSP statute).Under Florida law, any claim of the estate is separate and distinct from the claim of a survivor. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 12:32 pm
But one might expect that this kind of human error would not vary substantially over the years. [read post]
16 Oct 2024, 6:06 am
The inability of these intransigents to agree on how to implement the Court’s first such decision in 2009 in Sejdić and Finci v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 4:07 am
Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries directing the lower court to reconsider its ruling against a bakery owner who refused to make a case for a same-sex wedding “seem[s] to invite the state court to scour the record below in search of some expression of hostility to the baker’s religious beliefs that might justify letting her off the hook in this current violation of the state’s human rights law. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 9:07 am
The photographers lost their appeal to the Human Rights Court. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 5:18 am
State v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 8:59 am
R (Limbuela) v. [read post]
4 Mar 2025, 9:10 am
[1] Thomson-Reuters Enterprise Centre GMBH v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 7:12 am
However, the court stated that the extent of that enhanced protection is less clear. [read post]
17 May 2011, 10:55 pm
R (on the application of Evans) v The Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice [2011] EWHC 1146 (Admin) - Read judgment The High Court has found that the Ministry of Justice, when making a decision to cease the state’s funding of judicial review challenges on purely public interest grounds (apart from one exception), took into account the fact that to do so would reduce the number of decisions being made which were not in the government’s… [read post]
29 Oct 2022, 7:30 am
The Standard-Setting Potential of International Human Rights Litigation in Addressing Climate Displacement," Chapter in Yearbook of International Disaster Law Online, vol. 3, no. 1 (2020; published Feb. 2022) - Authors (2) = Netherlands/Fiji, Netherlands [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 2:02 pm
Austin [v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 6:10 am
United States. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 5:28 am
Vos J stated that the Human Rights Act 1998 is individualised, and as such neither the gypsy and traveller community nor any other community has Article 8 rights (a person’s right to respect for their private and family life, home and correspondence). [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 3:40 am
It has been stressed that the question of whether the harm from a third party resulted from a positive act or from an omission by the police should not justify a different outcome and that the distinction was unmeritorious: Brooks v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2005] 1 WLR 1495 at [32] and repeated in Michael v Chief Constable of South Wales Police [2015] 1 AC 1732 at [51]. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 9:32 pm
The judgment in the case of State of West Bengal v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 4:18 pm
There is one case that is especially on point: in Dixon v. [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 4:30 am
There’s a Supreme Court case called Gilmer v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 6:42 am
A case released by the Connecticut Appellate Court, Prioleau v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 pm
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, V. vulnificus bloodstream infections are fatal in about half of cases. [read post]
