Search for: "In Re CAL"
Results 4321 - 4340
of 5,821
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2019, 1:54 pm
Cal. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
Karlan, The New Countermajoritarian Difficulty, 109 Cal. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 7:35 am
Cal. 2014). [read post]
8 May 2014, 5:56 am
Cal. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 12:01 pm
Special thanks to Duncan Hosie, Eva Stevenson, Cal Barnett-Mayotte, and Farzana Ali for their assistance on this blog and accompanying report. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 12:20 pm
Cal. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 3:49 am
#TeamKatIn contrast, if one adopts the view of a US court in the Eksouzian v Albanese case (2015 WL 4720478 (CD Cal Aug. 7, 2015) that “hashtags are merely descriptive devices, not trademarks, unitary or otherwise, in and of themselves”, a trade mark infringement might be most unlikely or even excluded (here is a worth reading article of Prof. [read post]
19 May 2023, 8:41 am
Cal. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 5:00 am
Cal. [read post]
13 Dec 2014, 11:13 am
We provided proof our client was totally disabled, copies of the text of Cal Ins. [read post]
21 Feb 2025, 1:00 pm
Cal. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 8:43 am
A “mere wish or plan” for obtaining the claimedinvention does not satisfy the written description requirement.Regents of the Univ. of Cal. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 3:22 pm
Cal. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 7:32 am
Cal.) [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 3:15 pm
Brad Sherman (D-Cal). [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 9:43 am
Cal. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 9:29 am
Cal. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 6:17 am
Cal.) [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 8:36 am
Cal. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 2:20 am
The class-action lawyers attribute this to "the FTC's lack of vigor," a counterintuitive accusation when we're actually seeing regulatory overreach.They also say that the FTC "does not represent the interests of Plaintiffs" and "is under no obligation" to do so anyway. [read post]
