Search for: "In re E.G."
Results 4321 - 4340
of 13,687
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2013, 9:46 am
We are confident it is authentic and translate and re-publish it here with Mingjing’s permission. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 6:52 am
These success stories, as well as the failure stories (e.g. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:59 pm
"We're writing a rule for the ages," he humbly offered.In principle, that's legitimate. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 4:46 pm
[See, e.g., 49 U.S.C. 40103(a)(1) re: “Sovereignty and the Right of Public Transit – (1) The United States Government has exclusive sovereignty of airspace of the United States. [read post]
21 Feb 2015, 5:47 am
Patent & Trademark Office turned down requests for re-examination in May. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 8:00 am
(discussing In re McDaniel, 293 F.3d 1379, 1384-85 (Fed. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 6:38 pm
See,e.g., Norman v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 3:28 am
In re Elisabeth Stecki DBA Whineware, Serial No. 87215481 (January 24, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas W. [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 9:17 am
Not all of these jurisdictions were remote (e.g., Nebraska was in person). [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 2:23 am
In re Louis Vuitton Malletier, Appeal No. 2018-1651 (Fed. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 8:50 pm
It wants to know whether any such “designated hitter” programs are already in place and, if so, how they’re working. [read post]
16 Nov 2013, 7:59 pm
See, e.g., Aventis Pharma S.A. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 12:38 pm
”); In re Coors Brewing Co., 343 F.3d 1340, 1345 (Fed. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 4:00 am
It will be followed by another offering a thought or two on how brands, from lifestyle dictators, may be en route to exile from consumer life, ‘cleansed’ and re-defined by a new regulatory paternalism. [read post]
8 Jul 2018, 7:31 pm
The patent system, which can protect rights in the drug and/or method of use, allows a drug innovator to re-coup the significant expense of drug testing. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 12:30 am
Whereas “chocolate” turned up blank, “ice cream” got me to the Dippin’Dots case (In Re Dippin'Dots Patent Litigation). [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 6:31 am
If a candidate wins by a wide margin in a state, there’s futility in the challenge (or less value in the challenge if you’re the winning candidate!). [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 1:35 am
If applicable, oral proceedings will be (re)scheduled to take place at the earliest possible date. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 1:25 pm
Interface Architectural Res. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 12:45 pm
See, e.g., U.S. [read post]
