Search for: "Label v Label" Results 4321 - 4340 of 13,304
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2012, 10:56 am by Courtney Minick
In AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, L.P. v Apotex Corp., the Court held for defendant generic manufacturers on the grounds that Plaintiff failed to state a 35 U.S.C. 271(e)(2) claim based on defendants’ existing ANDA filings, and claims premised on presumed future labeling amendments were not ripe for adjudication. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 10:56 am by Courtney Minick
In AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, L.P. v Apotex Corp., the Court held for defendant generic manufacturers on the grounds that Plaintiff failed to state a 35 U.S.C. 271(e)(2) claim based on defendants’ existing ANDA filings, and claims premised on presumed future labeling amendments were not ripe for adjudication. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 7:34 am by Thomas Key
Labeling this work with the artist responsible for the original is a means of giving credit to 50 Cent, rather than implying his endorsement of the work. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 2:25 pm
  Not to be confused with another preemption decision, Funk v. [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 3:48 am by Ben
For the record labels, the deals will provide significant new revenue source. [read post]