Search for: "MATTER OF RULES OF EVIDENCE"
Results 4321 - 4340
of 42,343
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2017, 6:00 am
DOC argued that only timeliness was appealed to the Superintendent, so the insufficient-evidence argument wasn’t properly before the court and the court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 3:18 pm
The Ruling: Under the rules, a jury verdict should not be set aside as contrary to the weight of the evidence unless the jury could not have reached its verdict on any fair interpretation of the evidence. [read post]
14 Oct 2018, 9:38 am
The rule is different when all objects of the conspiracy are sound as a legal matter, but one of them lacks adequate evidentiary support. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 4:09 am
Lewis did not set out a per se rule). [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 1:43 am
Sara Parrello and Fabio AngeliniIt is quite uncommon to have an administrative law Court ruling on IP matters, but sometimes it happens. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:51 pm
Supreme Court rulings turned 50 years old. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 4:29 pm
Below is a summary of the FISC and FISCR rulings. [read post]
31 Oct 2024, 9:00 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued a ruling in Republican National Committee (RNC) v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 4:50 am
Baldree 2013 SCC 35[1] An out-of-court statement by a person not called as a witness in the proceedings is properly characterized as hearsay where it is tendered in evidence to make proof of the truth of its contents. [2] It is undisputed on this appeal that hearsay evidence is presumptively inadmissible as a matter of law. [3] The sole issue is whether this exclusionary rule applies to “express hearsay” only, or to “implied hearsay” as… [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 5:00 am
The full court likewise declined to rehear the matter. [read post]
27 Dec 2015, 8:12 am
Even if students figure out that we're wrong on these points, we send a strong message that the rules don't matter; that it's ok to ignore them unless you're sitting in a class on Professional Responsibility. 4. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 10:16 am
After Judge Carey’s ruling, the Innocence Project and Northeastern Law Professor Daniel Medwed also filed complaints with the Office of Bar Counsel in Massachusetts against the two former Assistant Attorneys General who handled the initial Farak prosecution cited by Judge Carey as having suppressed the evidence in question, urging the bar to conduct an investigation into whether these former prosecutors’ conduct violated ethical rules warranting sanctions. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 1:01 pm
The judge should have allowed the jury to determine the truth of the matter. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 6:44 am
Judge Facciola observed that because the defendants failed to provide any evidence that they took reasonable efforts to prevent the disclosure, “the only injustice in this matter is that done by [d]efendants to themselves. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 5:48 am
Those pesky page limits matter. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 9:59 am
If one fails to do so, one will be precluded at the Hearing from presenting any additional documentary evidence, no matter how crucial it may be. [read post]
4 Jan 2015, 4:46 pm
In New Jersey, the Judge does not have to rule that you were drunk. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 9:15 am
Matters of credibility requiring resolution in the case of conflicting evidence should go to trial. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 7:20 am
Given that this was an emergency application, the court made a preliminary assessment of the evidence only. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 11:52 am
” This is a single digit multiplier and various courts have upheld similar awards as a matter of course. [read post]
