Search for: "State v. Favors" Results 4321 - 4340 of 37,557
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Fifteen years ago I was disinclined to support proposed changes to tenure “during good behavior,” a provision that had so well secured an independent federal judiciary.[5] This past year I urged the Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States to take very seriously the benefits of some reform and to try to seize the moment to build a consensus in favor of change towards a more sensible system of appointment and tenure for Supreme Court Justices. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm by Caroline A. Crenshaw
Interestingly, the choice to redeem one’s shares does not impact the ability to vote in favor of completing the de-SPAC. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 4:17 pm by Coral Beach
We need to know exactly who in the company was aware of this failure and the alleged attempts to hide this information from the FDA,” DeLauro said during a meeting on the Fiscal Year 2023 Budget Request for the United States Department of Agriculture. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 6:15 pm by Mridula Raman
Share“John the Tiger Man,” a hypothetical dangerous prisoner invented by Justice Stephen Breyer, featured prominently in Tuesday’s oral argument in Shoop v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:44 pm by Eugene Volokh
Because "state appellate court decisions are highly persuasive and should be followed when they are the best evidence of state law," this weighs heavily in favor of Freeman's interpretation. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Favors v Cuomo, 2012 WL 928223 *2, 2012 US Dist LEXIS 36910, *10 [ED NY, Mar. 19, 2012, No. 11-CV-5632, Raggi, Lynch, and Irizarry, JJ.]; Rodriguez v Pataki, 2002 WL 1058054, *7, 2002 US Dist LEXIS, *25-27 [SD NY 2002, May 24, 2002, No. 02 Civ. 618, Walker, Ch. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Favors v Cuomo, 2012 WL 928223 *2, 2012 US Dist LEXIS 36910, *10 [ED NY, Mar. 19, 2012, No. 11-CV-5632, Raggi, Lynch, and Irizarry, JJ.]; Rodriguez v Pataki, 2002 WL 1058054, *7, 2002 US Dist LEXIS, *25-27 [SD NY 2002, May 24, 2002, No. 02 Civ. 618, Walker, Ch. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 11:08 am
Gotta make the appropriate effort.Parenthetically, what I was most surprised about was the contact information listed for appellant's counsel on the State Bar's web site. [read post]