Search for: "State v. Saide" Results 4321 - 4340 of 57,097
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2016, 5:39 am by Michael DeRose
” LaVecchia said that PERC and the appeals court should have been guided by the court’s 1982 ruling in In re Local 195, IFPTE v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 1:36 am by Matthew Flinn
The authority relied on by the Government included a Court of Appeal decision (R (Secretary of State for the Home Department) v Mental Health Review Tribunal [2002] EWCA Civ 1868 – “the PH case”) and three High Court decisions (R (G) v Mental Health Review Tribunal [2004] EWHC 2193 (Admin), R v Secretary of State for the Home Department) v Mental Health Review Tribunal [2004] EWHC 2194 (Admin) and IT v Secretary of… [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 9:50 am by gstasiewicz
Rodearmel challenging Hillary Clinton's constitutional eligibility to serve as Secretary of State (Rodearmel v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 4:27 am by INFORRM
Where a work is “so infected with fiction, dramatization or embellishment that it cannot be said to fulfill the purpose of the newsworthiness exception”, the exception will not apply (Messenger v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 7:05 am
(in support of petitioner) Brief amicus curiae of the United States (recommending certiorari be granted) Docket: 08-1175 Title:   Florida v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:25 am by David DePaolo
Oklahoma is probably the least likely state one would imagine to be the epicenter of workers' compensation controversy, but since the state did a "reform" which drastically altered some qualification for benefits as well as introducing an opt-out program, the state has been embroiled in dispute.Last week, of course, the state's Workers' Compensation Commission declared opt-out to be unconstitutional, failing the state's… [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Officers and Police Benevolent Assn., Inc. v New York State Off. of Mental Health, 2016 NY Slip Op 02696, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentThe New YorkState Correctional Officers and Police Benevolent Association, Inc. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Matter of McMorrow v Hevesi, 6 AD3d 925, the Appellate Division said that it has only recognized "active duty, which excludes temporary and intermittent . . . service in any reserve . . . force,"  for purposes of claiming member service credit pursuant to Retirement and Social Security Law §1000 and Military Law §243(1)(b). [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 2:59 am
Defendants stated that LFTB is "not what the typical layperson would consider meat," they called it "filler," they said it was added to "pump up" the volume of ground beef. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 10:57 am by nflatow
On November 9 the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in National Meat Association v. [read post]