Search for: "State v. So "
Results 4321 - 4340
of 117,850
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2009, 4:48 am
So it should come as no surprise that when important reform legislation is being considered, the political effect of small state Senators is magnified. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 4:21 am
" He also pointed out that a majority does not join Justice Stevens' piecemeal view of lenity, so the decision "does not hold that the outcome is different when contrary legislative history does exist. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 12:33 pm
So: is this another hard case applying bad law set out in ECJ precedent (but coming to the ‘correct’ conclusi [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 4:54 am
” K.W. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 5:48 am
One very recent case, Bisbing v. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 12:40 pm
Time will tell.Meanwhile, today's opinion is a pretty clear win for the counties -- and a loss for the state -- which will get more money to help pay for SVP proceedings. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 9:11 am
So far, I have said nothing about the so-called “twin aims of the Erie rule” in Hanna v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 8:17 pm
Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 1:10 pm
State, 426 So. 2d 963 (Fla. 1983)). [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 8:27 pm
The post U.S. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 7:45 am
Supreme Court issued its landmark decision Roe v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 8:58 am
So this moggy is enormously grateful to his EIP colleague Matthew Jones, for preparing a report of this case, which came out at the same time as the Actavis v Lilly decision. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 8:58 am
Prince Edward Island (PEISC (AD)) (aff’d by the Supreme Court of Canada) and the BC Court of Appeal decision in R. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 11:48 am
The decision in Phone Recovery Services, LLC. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 12:51 pm
"So says the dissenting Justice in City of Milwaukee Post No. 2874 Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:25 am
So King v. [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 9:07 am
Writing on behalf of the full panel in Meehan v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 9:06 am
The Supreme Court today decided Air Wisconsin v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 3:00 am
If so, then the court lacks jurisdiction, because there is no diversity jurisdiction where one of the parties is a US citizen with a foreign domicile (since such a person is not an alien and is not a citizen of any state of the United States for the relevant purposes). [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 9:35 am
Pritchard v. [read post]
