Search for: "The United States, Petitioner"
Results 4321 - 4340
of 8,962
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2015, 9:12 pm
With the approved Immigrant Visa, our client can come to the United States immediately, and she will get her green card within two months of entry. [read post]
19 May 2015, 3:08 pm
As for the impacts associated with the proposed revisions, FWS and NMFS state in the proposed rule that “[w]hile some of the changes may require petitioners to expend some time (such as coordination with State(s)) and effort (providing complete petitions), we do not expect this will prove to be a hardship, economically or otherwise. [read post]
19 May 2015, 11:28 am
By Rich McHugh The United States Supreme Court yesterday issued a unanimous opinion in Tibble et al. v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 9:01 pm
The petitioners in Glossip claim that the evidence shows that midazolam neither kills pain nor reliably maintains a patient in an unconscious state during the process of execution, thus exposing the condemned prisoner to the excruciating suffering resulting from the two drugs administered after the midazolam, which, just to reiterate, stop the prisoner from breathing (through paralysis) and then stop the prisoner’s heart. [read post]
18 May 2015, 1:45 pm
That provision precludes IFP status for prisoners who have “on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. [read post]
18 May 2015, 5:23 am
If the petition was not filed within that period, and if L.A.H. was "now settled" in the United States, the district court had discretion whether to order her return. [read post]
16 May 2015, 4:45 am
Petitioner would have incurred the costs of feeding, clothing and otherwise supporting his children and himself whether his children were in the United States or Germany. [read post]
15 May 2015, 9:02 am
And one additional observation: Things are getting crowded in United States Telecom Association v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:16 pm
United States 14-740Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel to the petitioner in this case.Issue: Whether the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule applies to a search warrant that is itself the fruit of the poisonous tree. [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:04 pm
United States, No. 13-7451, Slip op. [read post]
14 May 2015, 2:15 pm
Kim, that under United States v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 11:23 am
It appears that the RIN fraud in the United States and the biofuel subsidy fraud in Canada proceeded on parallel tracks. [read post]
13 May 2015, 11:40 pm
We demonstrated the intrinsic merit of our client’s research in the United States, the national scope of his research, and asserted that our client would serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than would an available U.S. worker having the same minimum qualifications. [read post]
13 May 2015, 7:15 pm
United States 14-1145Issue: Whether, under Holland v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 8:58 am
" House Passes Bill Jeopardizing Drinking Water Across the Country EPA WOTUS Rule website <> Energy Department Authorizes Corpus Christi Liquefaction Project to Export Liquefied Natural Gas - DOE announced that it has issued a final authorization for the Corpus Christi Liquefaction Project (Corpus Christi) to export domestically produced liquefied natural gas (LNG) to countries that do not… [read post]
12 May 2015, 9:09 am
It includes petitions: to allow current H-1B workers to change employers to work concurrently in a second H-1B job to change the terms of a current H-1B worker’s employment, and to extend the amount of time a current H-1B worker is permitted to stay in the United States. [read post]
11 May 2015, 4:54 pm
Our client is a beneficiary of an approved I-129F petition and came to the United States as a K-1 Fiancée of a U.S. [read post]
11 May 2015, 1:52 am
We demonstrated the intrinsic merit of our client’s research in the United States, the national scope of his research, and asserted that our client would serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than would an available U.S. worker having the same minimum qualifications. [read post]
10 May 2015, 5:48 pm
OPINION OF THE SUPREME COURT GRANTING IMMUNITY IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS ════════════ NO. 14-0536 ════════════ JESUS RUBEN MOLINA, PETITIONER, v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:18 am
United States, 14-419. [read post]
