Search for: "Defendants A-F" Results 4341 - 4360 of 29,820
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2020, 11:26 am by Sandy Levinson
Waters, as some of you may recall, affirmatively defended the idea of relatively easy secession from existing states; Buckley offered a number of very good reasons why the United States would be better off breaking up, though he ultimately counseled against it.I mentioned in my own contribution to that symposium the forthcoming publication of Richard Kreitner’s Break It Up:  Secession, Division and the Secret History of America’s Imperfect Union. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 9:48 am by Lyle Roberts
., 962 F.3d 405 (9th Cir. 2020), the plaintiff alleged that Endologix misled its investors about whether the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) would approve Nellix, the company’s aneurysm sealing product. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 8:25 pm by Evan Brown
Allnurses.com, Inc., — F.3d —, 2020 WL 4809911 (8th Cir. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 11:01 am by Arnold Wadsworth Coggins
And, “[i]f a district court’s ruling on a 60(b) motion is based on clearly erroneous factual findings or flawed legal conclusions, the district court has likely abused its discretion. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 7:53 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Collezione Europa USA, Inc., 618 F.3d 417 (4th Cir. 2010), which upheld a false designation of origin claim even though the defendant never sold any of the plaintiff’s products as if they were produced by the defendant. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 7:46 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 He alleged that he “paid hotel charges that were not as advertised,” and paid a higher price than he would have “in the absence of Defendant’s misrepresentations and omissions. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 9:03 pm by Peter Conti-Brown
The Regulatory Review pays tribute to Judge Stephen F. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 2:06 pm
Cai naturally sought to defend them on a variety of grounds, but in the process made clear an unwillingness to acknowledge or conform to emerging behavior expectations for senor academics. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 9:00 am
At issue was whether a settlement between plaintiffs and certain de minimis parties for future potential response costs was an adequate triggering event for the statute of limitations period (against different defendants) in an action for contribution under CERCLA Section 113(f). [read post]