Search for: "English v. English"
Results 4341 - 4360
of 11,196
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2016, 8:01 am
China NNN Agreements are the key to protecting your IP from China before you provide your IP to anyone in China. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 6:07 am
That’s from Texas Alcoholic Beverage Comm’n v. [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 3:51 pm
In Suarez v. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 4:00 am
Ontario (Disability Support Program) v. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 12:00 am
The case of Napp Pharmaceutical Holdings Limited v (1) Dr Reddy's Laboratories (UK) Limited (2) Sandoz Limited [2016] EWCA Civ 1053 is a welcome reminder that the English Patents Court and Court of Appeal can, when required, deliver swift justice in a way that would be the envy of many IP Courts the world over. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 6:36 pm
This means that, unlike the AmeriKat, not only is English contract law his focus but he loves it. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 3:04 pm
The 2015 Ontario Superior Court of Justice decision in Oudin v. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 5:00 am
VMedia: The David and Goliath battle over the future of TV https://t.co/K4UEiDssBv -> Supreme Court Renders Landmark Privacy decision in Royal Bank of Canada v. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 2:56 am
In settling EEOC v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 8:54 am
The English text of the Treaty cedes sovereignty to the Queen of England; guarantees Māori “the full exclusive and undisturbed possession of their Lands and Estates Forests Fisheries and other properties which they may collectively or individually possess,” with the Crown having the exclusive right of preemption with respect to land purchases; and provides Māori with “all the Rights and Privileges of British Subjects. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 3:03 am
He is a research associate at the CCP Research Foundation and also works as international counsel in an English law firm. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 12:44 am
The judge held that the “undue burden” concept in English law (particularly as outlined by Arnold J in Eli Lilly v Janssen in 2014) was not particularly helpful under Australian law. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 5:49 am
Not the actual club at issue.Photo by Rhinoedit at English Wikipedia, CC BY-SA 3.0. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 4:55 am
Posted by Charles Sartain North Shore Energy v. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 4:00 am
Montgomery v. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 3:44 am
Thankfully, for the thousands of European Patent Attorneys carrying out panic-stricken searches through files hastily-retrieved from the archive, it appears with retrospect that Edwards v Cook represents the high-water mark of the English Courts adopting a strict formulaic approach to priority entitlement. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 6:08 am
By Kelly McClure In Araujo v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 7:04 am
Maria KendrickKing's College LondonIntroduction by Brian Cordery and Rik Lambers “As many readers will know, the English High Court ruled on a legal challenge as to whether the government could trigger Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty without parliamentary approval. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 6:51 am
In last year, Sofa Works v. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 1:35 am
Accordingly, MMGR’s claim that the English courts did not have jurisdiction was rejected by the High Court. [read post]
