Search for: "In re Grant"
Results 4341 - 4360
of 33,817
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2022, 10:07 am
Res Judicata and the Patent-Specific Kessler Doctrine: PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 2:00 pm
Not what we're used to in these situations. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 6:39 am
Form an LLC Limited liability corporations (LLCs) don’t get their name by chance – they’re used to limit your personal liability, and thus, grant some measure of protection to your assets. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 2:00 am
Re Lloyd, 24 O.R. (2d) 340, is a 1979 decision by the Ontario Surrogate Court, as it was called. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
Judge Dow granted in part defendant Kerg’s Fed. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 5:00 pm
Granted, it didn't go so well, but that's not the point. [read post]
26 May 2009, 11:02 am
XIII, §1 (1865).When the legislature gave to this court the power of granting licenses to practice law, it was with not the slightest expectation that this privilege would be extended to women.In re Bradwell, 55 Ill. 535 (1869).No person shall on account of sex be disqualified from entering upon or pursuing any lawful business, vocation, or profession.Cal. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 3:53 am
For certain independent claims, TT failed to supplement its FIC with manual re-centering elements as required by the Federal Circuit’s and the Court’s claim constructions. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 5:25 am
Burwell, in which it has already granted cert. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 5:50 am
Registering a trademark grants the owner exclusive rights to the mark within the specified industry. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 7:00 am
If you’re counting, this is the second time in a week that I’ve linked to something written by Martha. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 4:02 am
At Re’s Judicata, Richard Re discusses “personal precedent” in the context of the dissenting opinions by Justices Scalia and Ginsburg in Michigan v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 2:58 am
” Slip op at 9 (quoting In re Tobacco II, 46 Cal. 4th 326-27). [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 5:35 am
In re Vaughter, bkrtcy.W.D.Tex.1989, 109 B.R. 229. [read post]
24 May 2023, 4:45 am
Think of it as “Sleep with me, or you’re fired” or “Sleep with me, and you’re hired. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 12:07 pm
Metabolite Laboratories, Inc., the Court dismissed the petition for certiorari as improvidently granted, a decision that sparked three justices to dissent, showing that the Court may be looking for a case that presents a vehicle to rein in the scope of § 101.To read the order in In re Nuijten, click here. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 10:02 am
We’re on the leading edge of technology, because we’re the first ones to see how valuable it is. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 1:08 pm
Granted, he was running unopposed and there's not a "none of the above" option, but that's still pretty funny! [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 12:20 pm
Krame has granted permission for S2KM to re-publish his list of 25 Questions here in S2KM blog format. [read post]
7 May 2007, 3:58 pm
If you're returning to a name you had before marriage, you're far less likely to be hassled about the change than if you adopt a completely new name, but you may still face some bureaucratic barriers in returning to a previous name. [read post]
