Search for: "Lee v. Lee"
Results 4341 - 4360
of 7,966
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2022, 6:01 am
Matt Perault detailed the shifting partisan fault lines in speech policy after Dobbs v. [read post]
The BASMATI saga: General Court accommodates extended passing off within Community trade mark system
3 Oct 2015, 2:58 am
Earlier this week Katfriend Nigel Urwin (Lee Bolton Monier-Williams) brought to the IPKat's attention news of a case (Tilda Riceland Private v OHMI - Siam Grains (BASMALI), T-136/14) that the General Court (GC) decided on 30 September last, and appears to have some relevant implications particularly as far as that peculiar creature of UK common law known as extended passing off is concerned.Before going into the details of the decision, what is extended passing off? [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 12:26 pm
So come August 9, WilmerHale's Bill Lee will argue Apple's case for an injunction and Quinn Emanuel's Kathleen Sullivan will defend Judge Koh's decision.What could very well happen is a second hearing in front of the full court ("en banc"). [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 8:55 am
The Supreme Court issued its highly anticipated decision in TC Heartland v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 10:59 am
Brewster, 250 Va. 436, 442 (1995); Lee Gardens Arlington Limited Partnership v. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 10:00 am
And when the court addressed the 1846 retrocession in Phillips v. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 7:49 am
Lee Optical Co. or placing high barriers to entry by would-be florists is worth taking seriously. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 5:00 am
In his recent decision in the case of Cicon v. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 5:13 am
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court heard arguments in Dalmazzi v. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 8:26 pm
Lee, 136 S. [read post]
21 Apr 2019, 11:23 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 9:30 pm
”Ananda V. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 9:09 am
Since its 2002 landmark decision in Atkins v. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 8:00 am
Supreme Court issued a powerful decision in Flowers v. [read post]
2 May 2020, 8:39 am
House of Representatives v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:35 am
But the Court also held that plaintiff is not entitled to punitive damages for these civil rights violations.The case is Franco v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 7:11 am
Equally, it is generally accepted that copyright, at least, does not protect a "style" (in England and Wales there is Gordon Fraser v Tatt [1966] RPC 505, which establishes that proposition in respect of greeting cards). [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 11:58 am
Peter v. [read post]
14 Oct 2007, 5:22 am
Sam's East, Inc Eastern District of Michigan at DetroitRONALD LEE GILMAN, Circuit Judge. [read post]
